-
skymonkeyhorn commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest: Post Mortem 12 minutes ago
It is just amazing to me that most posters think that Jordan has improved so much in the last half of the season.
The one thing I will say is that Jordan has just started to show his ability with a basketball. The reason that he did not show his talents is up to all the
-
Ag_in_TX wrote a new blog post: Purdue Pre-game 18 minutes ago
Offense
Both teams are unselfish and preach sharing the ball. A&M is a balanced scoring team. Sloan showed in the first round against Utah State, for example, that he can defer when his teammates have things going. Purdue once again will have to rely on JaJuan Johnson and E’Twaun Moore to produce, and hope
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Hiphopopotamus commented on the blog post We Have Our Answer 34 minutes ago
And yes, it appears JoPo wrote pretty much the same thing. It’s hard to believe with all the national talking heads, fans, and everyone in between saying otherwise, but I think it’s the only conclusion to draw for anyone that really watched this team.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Hiphopopotamus commented on the blog post We Have Our Answer 34 minutes ago
And yes, it appears JoPo wrote pretty much the same thing. It’s hard to believe with all the national talking heads, fans, and everyone in between saying otherwise, but I think it’s the only conclusion to draw for anyone that really watched this team.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Hiphopopotamus wrote a new blog post: We Have Our Answer 36 minutes ago
Normally, after a big win or a crushing defeat, I don’t know what to think, say, or feel, because I can’t. And that what makes this one different; it’s just as painful, but I saw it coming. Instead of getting blindsided by the oncoming traffic, I was able to brace myself for the
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
whiskey commented on the blog post The week in news- Pariahs, Malcontents and Power Hour 55 minutes ago
I’m with you the off season is already old. I’m ready for the season to start. NDS I am completely fascinated by the Tech vs. Lech business. I can’t believe they ran off the guy that put them on the map and subsequently ended up with an arguable upgrade in Tubs.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
whiskey commented on the blog post Spring Preview: Tech Offense 1 hour ago
Ded 9-12 wins is pretty optomistic. I like it. I’m really looking forward to seeing what Tubs can do with them this year especially on D. I’m surprised you think the QB battle between Sticks and Nick will be close. Interesting, I figured Sticks was a runaway. I hope Corndog
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
dedfischer wrote a new blog post: Spring Preview: Tech Offense 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
Got a little time this morning and I’m rearing to talk some football. Here’s what the depth chart looks like headed into spring and a few thoughts:
Offense
QB Sr. Taylor Potts/Sr. Steven Sheffield – We’ve all annointed Sheffield as the starter, and I think that’s the case if we continue to run 99% of our snaps
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Black Scholes commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest: Post Mortem 4 hours, 38 minutes ago
lawdog – on the topic of regression, this crew can’t compare with the senior seasons Thomas and Atchley put up. Something ain’t right in this scenario. Mason topped out his sophomore year and Pittman last year.
Wangmene is ‘Manos de Piedra’ redux, so that was really never going to work out.
-
Kevin Berger wrote a new blog post: Top Ten Reasons Why Cal Can Beat Duke 6 hours, 38 minutes ago
This would probably go a bit better if you read it in your Bobby Knight voice and it had two decades worth of goodwill built up from its gratuitous appearance on a popular late night television show. But oh well.
1) Interior Worries. As in the Bears shouldn’t have any defensively
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Kevin Berger wrote a new blog post: Round 2 Saturday Recaps 7 hours, 34 minutes ago
We talked about the upset of the decade in this post, but I watched some other great basketball today I’d like to comment on.
For me, the theme of the day was well-played basketball. I’m not only talking about what Northern Iowa did, I’m talking about the other seven games being really well
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Sailor Ripley commented on the blog post Madness Magic: Northern Iowa Upsets Kansas 7 hours, 48 minutes ago
Just a phenomenal game.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Sailor Ripley commented on the blog post Recapping The South 7 hours, 59 minutes ago
Udoh was a fargging beast in that game. Very athletic player.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Sailor Ripley commented on the blog post Because We’re Dedicated To Doing Stupid Things – Tiny Gallon Reportedly Took Payout 8 hours, 23 minutes ago
Jesus. I think I see four horseman on the horizon.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Kevin Berger wrote a new blog post: Madness Magic: Northern Iowa Upsets Kansas 8 hours, 27 minutes ago
Today reminded me why I love this tournament so much. A good friend of mine mentioned to me that college basketball is the great equalizer of all athletic endeavors. At least of the sports we care about. He’s right.
For instance, you can have a 40 inch vertical, be Iverson quick,
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Nate Heupel commented on the blog post Because We’re Dedicated To Doing Stupid Things – Tiny Gallon Reportedly Took Payout 8 hours, 30 minutes ago
Patrick,
Unless you’re completely retarded, you know precisely what I meant. The closest any Big 12 team has gotten to winning the infamous Fuller Cup is the 2007 Texas squad. I can’t remember a team being that horribly undisciplined as a whole aside from the insane OU teams of the 80’s. That’s not
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Nate Heupel commented on the blog post Because We’re Dedicated To Doing Stupid Things – Tiny Gallon Reportedly Took Payout 8 hours, 30 minutes ago
Patrick,
Unless you’re completely retarded, you know precisely what I meant. The closest any Big 12 team has gotten to winning the infamous Fulmer Cup is the 2007 Texas squad. I can’t remember a team being that horribly undisciplined as a whole aside from the insane OU teams of the 80’s. That’s not
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Sailor Ripley wrote a new blog post: This Is Sparta! 8 hours, 43 minutes ago
Please make yourself welcome and Adam will be by shortly to keep you up to date on all Michigan State Spartan happenings.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Nickel Rover commented on the blog post Barnes worst team 8 hours, 47 minutes ago
I suppose anyone could be your “favorite Longhorn basketball player” but Ford did more than just about anyone…although Durant is clearly better. Ford’s supporting cast was better than Durant’s in his sophomore year. Durant’s had more talent (Augustin, James, Abrams) but Ford’s was more developed (Boddicker, Ivey, Mouton, Thomas) and had worked with him for
-
Nickel Rover commented on the blog post Bradley or Hamilton? 8 hours, 54 minutes ago
Crazy Joe, your thoughts intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
-
Nickel Rover commented on the blog post Bradley or Hamilton? 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
This notion of Hamilton as being a disaster area on defense is all a bit much. He rebounds extremely well which, if it wasn’t obvious, is extremely important in this game since it secures possession of the basketball. Winning in basketball is achieved through the scoring of baskets and it’s necessary to possess the basketball
-
Ojnab Bob commented on the blog post Best Opening Round I Can Remember 9 hours, 7 minutes ago
I posted earlier about how Collins’ effort just crippled Kansas today, but what amazed me the most was his complete inability to stay in front of his man on defense. UNI got a LOT of good looks out of penetration/pass after one of UNI’s modestly gifted athletes blew right by Sherron. The best
-
Scipio Tex wrote a new blog post: Best Opening Round I Can Remember 10 hours, 19 minutes ago
At least it’s shaping up that way if Sunday delivers.
As disappointed as I was in last year’s opening weekend of March Madness, this one is exceeding all expectations. Putting aside the fact that my bracket now resembles Kabul after the Taliban rolled through in ‘96 – a map of ordered failure –
-
J commented on the blog post Bid Dance: Day Three 10 hours, 46 minutes ago
Thanks for the kind words, Trips.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
J commented on the blog post Bid Dance: Day Three 10 hours, 47 minutes ago
You know who’s bitter and angry as fuck? This guy —> ME.
I can only hope our returning players (whoever that may be) remember this and realize they need to play motivated EVERY FUCKING GAME and put forward 40 MINUTES of effort each game.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Raoul Duke commented on the blog post Rumor Alert–TMG 11 hours, 18 minutes ago
Kid seems like a fantastic collegiate player. I haven’t seen any NBA info. Is he a legit prospect?
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
Raoul Duke commented on the blog post Bid Dance: Day Three 11 hours, 25 minutes ago
Tough day for Sherron on O and D.
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
-
GoHornsGo90 commented on the blog post Bradley or Hamilton? 12 hours, 9 minutes ago
To leave or stay?
-
Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post NCAA Tournament Open Thread: Weekend Edition 12 hours, 10 minutes ago
KSU moving on led by a hot shooting Pullen. BTW, White Mormons can shoot FTs. 22 for 25, I think. Imagine if we could shoot like that.
Wake’s coming back on Kentucky. They’re within 25 right now…..
-
Trips Right commented on the blog post Bid Dance: Day Three 12 hours, 28 minutes ago
Just wanted to say I feel for you guys. As a Texas fan I know how this feels even if it’s from a football perspective.
I still think you’re the best basketball team in the country, and unfortunately you ran into a team that packed a Villanova circa 1985 type game today. Meaning they
SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });
Horn Brain said:
July 28th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
How does Vegas have our expected wins higher than OU’s, but then give them better odds at the National Championship?
Newy25 said:
July 28th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
I would be selling USC at 6/1. They have to completely retool their defense and will start either a redshirt freshman or freshman QB.
Pete Carroll drops a game every year with 20 first rounders on it. I wonder what he will do with a rebuilding roster…
Stuck in MN said:
July 28th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
HornBrain- because OU has a pair and actually schedules teams with a pulse for nonconference.
KilgoreTrout said:
July 28th, 2009 at 8:39 pm
I think the Ags will win 6 this year. No more than 7, however.
Scipio Tex said:
July 28th, 2009 at 8:51 pm
Newy:
USC has a shot at losing two games, I think. Bad QB play is typically their kryptonite and having a new one will create some adversity for them when they can’t bludgeon someone with their running game.
Kilgore:
Why and which six teams will they beat?
09/05/09 vs. NEW MEXICO COLLEGE STATION
09/19/09 vs. UTAH STATE COLLEGE STATION
09/26/09 vs. UAB COLLEGE STATION
10/03/09 vs. Arkansas Arlington, Texas
10/10/09 vs. OKLAHOMA STATE COLLEGE STATION
10/17/09 at Kansas State Manhattan, Kan.
10/24/09 at Texas Tech Lubbock, Texas
10/31/09 vs. IOWA STATE COLLEGE STATION
11/07/09 at Colorado Boulder, Colo.
11/14/09 at Oklahoma Norman, Okla.
11/21/09 vs. BAYLOR COLLEGE STATION
11/26/09 vs. TEXAS COLLEGE STATION
Looks like 4-8 or 5-7 to me. They also stand a good chance of losing 5 of their last 6.
Turn the page, Fred said:
July 29th, 2009 at 3:34 am
….thus ensuring that Matthews commits to USC.
Benito said:
July 29th, 2009 at 3:41 am
The win totals only include regular season games, not conference championship or bowl games.
StatsAreForLosers said:
July 29th, 2009 at 5:28 am
Scip-
You are giving the Aggies way too much credit. 3-9 or 2-10 are staring them in the face. I think the Aggies lose game after UAB. While you may think that the Aggies can win the IOWA STATE game, by kickoff the Aggies will be in complete implosion from a season of ineptitude. I give them 2 or 3 games because I do not know the state of NM US or UAB football.
soliver465 said:
July 29th, 2009 at 5:50 am
Stuck in MN
A pair of what, certainly not BCS Bowl game wins in the last 6 years.
Stuck in MN said:
July 29th, 2009 at 6:20 am
Stones, juevos, marbles, nads.
Look, I hate the OU program and everything those cheating bastards stand for, but they do provide a decent blueprint of what Mack and Deloss should do for scheduling if they ever decide to remove the skirts.
Blueshorn said:
July 29th, 2009 at 6:29 am
“How does Vegas have our expected wins higher than OU’s, but then give them better odds at the National Championship?”
Because the oddsmakers recognize zeroU’s penchant for getting to the title game when they don’t deserve it?
KilgoreTrout said:
July 29th, 2009 at 6:45 am
We win the 1st 3 non conference games, then beat KSU, ISU & Colorado. If we progress we should be able to beat the Baptists at home. We lost to KSU last year but I think they will be worse this year. Baylor should take a step back this year especially on defense and LT.
Stuck in MN said:
July 29th, 2009 at 6:59 am
I think the more interesting question is why do they give us better odds to win the Big 12 but OU better odds to win the national championship?
Are they saying that once in the BCS championship game, OU’s chances of winning that game are better than ours? Given OU’s history in the BCS, probably not. I think they are saying that in the event of a batch of 3 undefeateds, or 3 1-loss teams, OU is more likely to make the championship game than we are due to their stronger schedule/penchant for running up the score in November games.
Eskimohorn said:
July 29th, 2009 at 7:03 am
A&M has a favorable north schedule, playing the other 3 horrible teams in the conference. They have a shot at going 4-4 in conference, with an upset of Baylor or Tech. A lot depends on how Colorado and Arkansas are this year.
They are also staring down another 4-8 season, possibly 3-9, if they don’t have their shit together early on. 5-7 would be likely.
Nordberg said:
July 29th, 2009 at 7:24 am
“I think they are saying that in the event of a batch of 3 undefeateds, or 3 1-loss teams, OU is more likely to make the championship game than we are due to their stronger schedule/penchant for running up the score in November games.”
I fucking swear to god, if this shit happens again I will stop watching college football.
Nick The Greek said:
July 29th, 2009 at 7:31 am
Odds are all about spreading the money between teams so the house nets the vig, and ain’t out on the loser or winner…think about it…
uthookem said:
July 29th, 2009 at 7:33 am
Bullshit, Nordberg. You’ll always watch, just like the rest of us.
chitwood said:
July 29th, 2009 at 8:28 am
incorrect, Nick. That is an urban myth. Vegas definitely takes sides on bets.
chitwood said:
July 29th, 2009 at 8:36 am
as a follow up, on these futures bets, there is no traditional “vig” (such as laying 110 to win 100 on a normal bet). The vig is the shitty odds they lay you versus the true odds of the event happening.
UT_BKC said:
July 29th, 2009 at 8:47 am
Stuck – I really don’t want to start following OU’s scheduling practices. Yes, this year looks nice. BYU. Yay. A team that gets 10 wins in the MWC (look at the BCS teams they played and how ‘well’ they did against them). This is a nice game I guess, but how much credit should we really give them. Is anyone going to give us a ton of credit for beating a 10 win rice team last year? Should they?
Miami is fine. They got a BCS team on there. It’s not their fault that Miami sucks so much now. Just like it’s not our fault that 1) Arkansas sucked ass last year and 2) they decided to drop us this year.
Then we ge have Tulsa. Go 10 win CSUA teams (that can’t beat arkansas)!
Finally, there’s that D2 team they schedule. Yeah, takes a giant set of balls to schedule them.
We could definitely do better, but I don’t really think OU is the team we should be trying to mimic.
Stuck in MN said:
July 29th, 2009 at 9:28 am
What’s the difference between Lou-Monroe and a D2 team? The chances of either of Texas or OU losing that game approach levels so close to zero only Huck could calculate them. And I would say that any of BYU, Tulsa, or Miami would beat any of Wyoming, UTEP, and Rice.
I think the ideal non-conf schedule would include a legit top 25 program from a BCS conference, a couple of top 50-75 teams, and one total pushover to give you a rest week. Their schedule gets a lot closer to this than ours.
Now take a look at the next 6 years- OU has home and homes with FSU, ND and Tennessee while we have UCLA, Ole Miss and Minnesota. It is hard to predict how good these teams will be at the time that we play them, but at this moment I’d much rather have their schedule.
uthookem said:
July 29th, 2009 at 11:25 am
I think I’ll take UCLA, Ole Miss, and Minny over FSU, ND, and Tennessee.
UCLA, Ole Miss, and Minny all have new coaches that are building, and should be getting better over the next few years. Unless ND does something this year, they will still be re-building when OU plays them, and FSU is sort of in the same rut until Bowden retires. Tennessee could go either way, but I think UCLA will be ranked higher playing in the PAC-10 with fewer losses than Tennessee will take over the same time period.
Ole Miss > FSU
Minny > ND (on ranking only, not exposure/hype)
UCLA ~ Tenn
Just my thoughts.
UT_BKC said:
July 29th, 2009 at 11:36 am
Past 3 seasons:
FSU: 9-4, 7-6, 7-6
ND: 7-6, 3-9, 10-3 (They played in a bowl last year?!)
Tennessee: 5-7, 10-4, 9-4
UCLA: 4-8, 6-7, 7-6
Ole Miss: 9-4, 3-9, 4-8
Minnesota: 7-6, 1-11, 6-7
I will NOT give anyone credit for scheduling ND if they scheduled them in the last 4 or 5 years. I DO give them credit for scheduling Tenn. They are good at smelling blood in the water it seems. Tenn will be in the middle of rebuilding AGAIN after firing Kiffin.
We don’t play Rice this year. UCF instead. And Rice lost a close one to Tulsa last year.
BYU is a decent non BCS team, but I think they take a step backwards this year. Yes, they return a good QB and RB, but they lose a WR who accounted for almost half of their passing TDs, and they lose THREE starters on the line. Even in the MWC I think this will cause them to take a step back from their 3rd place finish. I don’t think they will really be too much better than UCF.
I’m just really not that impressed.
The General said:
July 29th, 2009 at 11:45 am
It does not matter how good OU’s schedule actually is, it matters how good it is perceived to be by journalists and SID’s.
UT_BKC said:
July 29th, 2009 at 11:47 am
General – True. I wish that BYU game were not so early. I think they will get more credit for it than they would have near the end of the season when BYU already had 2 or 3 losses.
Vasherized said:
July 29th, 2009 at 12:45 pm
OU’s schedule is better than ours no matter how you slice it.
In fact, there aren’t any national championship contenders that have a weaker OOS schedule than we do.
Which means we have to win every game, beat ranked teams convincingly (while keeping OU and OSU in the Top 10), and hope two other teams from a BCS conference don’t do the same.
Scipio Tex said:
July 29th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Yep. It will also play against us if we find ourselves in a group of one loss teams scenario – say, Florida, OU, USC.
Florida gets the SEC pass and USC gets the ESPN blowjob.
Nordberg said:
July 29th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
It wouldn’t suck or anything to go undefeated, and watch USC play Florida for the NC.
That would probably end my relationship with college football.
Vasherized said:
July 29th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
And Ohio State gets the mullet lube.
f Arkansas.
Jim Harrison said:
July 29th, 2009 at 1:02 pm
Does USC get fellated post SEC/ESPN marriage?
Scipio Tex said:
July 29th, 2009 at 1:04 pm
Jim:
Yes.
In a “we’ve always dreamed that the SEC champion could finally play USC for the title as it should have been for the last five years” sort of way.
UT_BKC said:
July 29th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
Vash – I don’t think that our schedule is too much weaker than OU, unless Miami is a lot better than expected. But I will concede that it is slightly better and will certainly be perceived as better.
UF though has a horrible schedule. Certainly not better than ours. Charleson Southern, Troy, FIU, and FSU. The first is D2, and the second 2 are on par with Wyoming and La-Monroe (who actually beat Troy and FIU last year).
Of course it won’t matter because UF plays in the SEC…
Orangechip said:
July 29th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
ESPN is not stupid. They have to appease ALL the big markets. Texas and USC and ND will always get big press. Mostly positive, too. They just won’t isolate a big chunk of their viewership.
Vasherized said:
July 29th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
Does USC get fellated post SEC/ESPN marriage?
Hell yes. USC is Hollywood’s team, Disney’s HQ.
They’re hip, young, and edgy. Like a sportscenter broadcast. At least that’s what my program guide tells me.
Vasherized said:
July 29th, 2009 at 1:11 pm
Of course it won’t matter because UF plays in the SEC…
Exactly. Florida can lose to Ole Miss at home and a speech from Tim Tebow can make it all disappear.
Shermansrevenge said:
July 29th, 2009 at 1:14 pm
I wouldn’t feel comfortable betting the under on South Carolina. There’s a new strength coach who appears to have lit a fire under the players during an off-season, and a new offensive line coach who appears to have made strides in improving the pitiful offensive line we had last year. The secondary did indeed take a big hit, but Darian Stewart is perhaps the best safety you’ve never heard of, certainly in the SEC. Finally, we’ve got a deep and athletic defensive line to go with a stud OLB in Eric Norwood.
As for Garcia? We’ll see. He’s stayed out of the headlines recently and the lack of QB depth may keep SOS from giving him the quick hook and wrecking his confidence. I think seven wins is a distinct possibility, given the positive impressions of the new coaching staff.
UT_BKC said:
July 29th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
Yeah, ufortunately, OU ’settled’ the question as to wheter or not the big 12 South was better than the SEC’s champ. Now ESPN can get back to trying to get USC and and SEC team to play in the MNC.
Scipio Tex said:
July 29th, 2009 at 1:57 pm
Shermansrevenge:
In fact, SC has six new coaches this year. You view this as a positive? I’m not so sure.
I love Norwood. I also don’t doubt your ability to play solid run D. Your secondary lost three starters and your OL was fairly disgraceful last year.
There’s no question that seven wins is a possibility as we’re not exactly talking about getting to a BCS bowl, but SC just seems to check a lot of the boxes that I typically see in a program about to underperform.
Nonetheless, thanks for the civil conversation.
Flamingmonkeyass said:
July 29th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
Is Michael Irvin one of those new coaches? If so you’re going to need a replacement:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090730/ap_on_re_us/us_accused_horse_molester;_ylt=AjYGNJRs0N3.8RncLZJV6pRH2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTE1dXU1NGc1BHBvcwM1BHNlYwN5bi1jaGFubmVsBHNsawNwb2xpY2VzY21hbmM-
HeroinHarry said:
July 30th, 2009 at 3:32 am
Put a grand on both Florida and Texas and you’re pretty much on a freeroll.