• Facebook StumbleUpon
• Email

1. Parlin Hall said:

   May 15th, 2009 at 9:21 am

   I like the Bomar Family Metaphor of having the world by the tail–only to see it yanked out.

2. HornsHornsHorns said:

   May 15th, 2009 at 9:41 am

   “Water is wet.”

   Nice.

3. Facebook User said:

   May 15th, 2009 at 9:42 am

   
   

   Jerry Reese, the general manager, said Bomar would compete with David Carr and Andre Woodson for a backup spot.

   Man, it’s a crap shoot.

4. Blueshorn said:

   May 15th, 2009 at 10:28 am

   Where are the enablers from ousux? We need some spin, baby!

5. ponderos said:

   May 15th, 2009 at 10:49 am

   Jerry Bomar’s a complete dick, that’s a fact. Quoting him about moral standards is like quoting bin Laden on religious tolerance.

6. beowulf said:

   May 15th, 2009 at 10:53 am

   …..Or ponderos calling someone, anyone, a complete dick.

7. Blueshorn said:

   May 15th, 2009 at 11:05 am

   I knew we could count on ponderos to wade into the fray and cast dispersions on Jerry, the man who delivered his boy to Little Boob and the Big Red machine.

   That’s gratitude, I tell ya…

8. Nth Handle said:

   May 15th, 2009 at 11:18 am

   ponderos, you only think that – ONLY – because he was kicked off the team.

9. HenryJames said:

   May 15th, 2009 at 11:20 am

   I thought Jerry Bomar was a dick when Rhett committed to OU. Since Rhett left OU my opinion of Jerry has not changed.

10. ponderos said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 11:22 am

    No, I think that because I’ve met him.

    Total dick.

11. ponderos said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 11:24 am

    btw, Blueshorn … I think you mean “aspersions.” I’m not dispersing Jerry Bomar anywhere.

12. Blueshorn said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 11:38 am

    Yes, ponderos, that’s exactly what I meant. Aspersions. Thank you. I realized that after I posted but couldn’t edit it.

    One might hope a gooner smart enough to know the difference would find these comments about his program alarming. But alas, you decided to shoot the messenger and enable the coverup. That’s exactly what I expected, so you didn’t disappoint.

13. RansomStoddard said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 11:47 am

    Gee, the gooner program is built on lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud?

14. Minnesotahorn said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 11:52 am

    Oh Jerry Bomar’s a total douche. On that I think we can all agree. He’s also a total douche that’s dying to spill his guts and one of these days is going to.

    I can’t help but smile warmly at the small town divorce feel of this whole thing. Each side is going around crying to everyone about the other party being just what everyone told them they were when the two got together.

15. beowulf said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    2 wrongs don’t make a right.

    Bomar and Stoops are both douchebags.

    What do 2 douchebags make?

    A ponderos?

16. Blueshorn said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    Nice analogy, Minnesota. It does have that sort of Harper Valley PTA hypocrisy to it, where all the losers in the podunk town deserve each other.

    I can’t decide what to hope for. I wonder which of the following scenarios would be more likely to make Jerry spill:

    1. Rhett makes it big in the league and Jerry spills in a “we showed you Norman douchebags” display of arrogance.

    2. Rhett gets cut and ends up working as the assistant manager on the night shift at a Jack-in-the-Crack, at which point Jerry spills in a fit of anger at the injustice of it all.

    Predictions?

17. horns down said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    “Gee, the gooner program is built on lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud?”

    “Where are the enablers from ousux? We need some spin, baby!”

    As usual I’m up and more than ready to meet your Horns Up challenge – ‘Tis but a cake walk. Your pompous assertion, all things considered: the gooner program is built on “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud”, I more than readily admit as the Goddamned truth and I’ve got not one single problem or qualm with it. Oh, was what you said supposed to have been an insult or an attempt at some form of slander? Big deal, who cares, and just go and kiss my Sooner Boomer ass.

    Far as I am concerned, the foundational principle of what we affectionately refer to as Capitalism around here happens to be just what you said, “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud”. And, by the way, I seriously doubt if any of you Horns Up pro-capitalists, the Donald Trump cocksucking buttkissers, on these boards would have enough intellectual muscle, not even if it were combined and coordinated, to prove me wrong on this. Too bad and so sorry, losers.

    Also, the last time I remembered, isn’t your program the biggest money making and the most profitable of all the programs in the land? If that be the case (and it must be so, since you Horns Up boys can’t ever seem to shut your bragging about it at every chance you all get), do you Horns have any room to be talking? Or to be throwing any stones at anyone else? Are you boys seriously going to try to pawn off to the rest of the world the plausibility that your program can make all that dough, while, at the same time, remaining clean as a whistle and totally free of “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud”. Why do I doubt that you Horns Up boys will have a whole heaping trouble passing this B.S., fucking ridiculous line off on anyone or anywhere outside of Homo Heaven Austin.

    Come on now, let’s get real. What do we all know about money and its nature? Since its creation it has been referred to as what? The root of all evil, right? And from this basic principle and fact of life, we can assume what? It is very easy and I am sure even you Horns Up boys should have little trouble comprehending it. Isn’t it natural to suppose that whereever money, the root of all evil, concentrates, there also one will also always find along with it a high degree of corruption or as you all like to say: “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud”? Surely, you Horns Up boys are not naive enough to believe that money just happens to concentrate in one area just by accident or chance?

    For those that are dumb enough to even believe this is a possibility, I wish to inform them that money is not like their constipation, it does not concentrate in a person or an entity by mere accident or by poor eating habits. No, money is far too valuable to “evil” man for that to ever be the case.

    And to move to the philosophic level, the “Scarlet Letter” was also not named the scarlet letter by mere accident or for only aesthetic reasons. For one who is aware of the nature of sin, as Hawthorne was, one knows that the admission of sin always leaves an eternal, torturous, and an inerasable “scar”let letter in the hearts of men. And so, that the OU football program operates by “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud”, all the while not causing average OU fans to feel an ounce of guilt, remorse, or a scar in their hearts, not even while we are kicking your Horns Up asses in the RRS, must mean that operating by “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud” is not a sinful in the case of football programs within the state of Oklahoma.

    That must be the case. In fact, instead of remorse or guilt, I feel immense happiness that the OU program cheats like hell and still always gets away with it. More power to us. According to the unquestionable moral law of the heart for Sooners, cheating like hell to beat Horns Ups asses up and down the field and to take away the B12 title from you all, time after another Goddamn time, seems to be okay and we’ve got no problem with it at all. In fact we are proud like hell that we are smart, sly, and enterprising enough to get away with it all the time. I mean, look at how many MNC’s we have won compared to your Horns Up rinky dink list. Far as we are concerned, “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud” in our football program and in our Capitalism enterprise system is as American as apple pie.

    You see, told you it was ’tis but a piece of cake.

18. intellectual type said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    Tim has family in Oklahoma?

19. Black Scholes said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    horns down: still operating under the assumption BC pays by the word.

20. Trips Right said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    You’re a lousy fucking softball player, Jack.

21. ponderos said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    Scott Pakin, is that you?

22. Minnesotahorn said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    “Oh, was what you said supposed to have been an insult or an attempt at some form of slander?”

    You think we are joking or making with the funny stuff?

23. lowery said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 4:56 pm

    Jesus tapdancing Christ.

24. horns down said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    “horns down: still operating under the assumption BC pays by the word.”

    Hey, that’s fairly witty considering it came from you, but, unfortunately, Blackie, I’m afraid it still falls short by a large measure of the response I was hoping to receive from you which would finally put Horns Down in his place. It does not even manage to offer Horns Down a stimulating level of competition….yawn.

    Assuming you were actually a part of higher education, I am suspecting that you must have gotten your degree in a major which tested solely by the multiple choice bubble sheet. Don’t see how it could be otherwise, since, from what I have seen from you so far, you seem incapable of forming a comprehendable thought which can extend longer than two mere sentences – with the meager two being, typically, only accidentally cobbled together in some extremely pedestrian and uninspired manner.

    Don’t see how anything I said above should surprise anyone. To sum up all I said was this: better to cheat like hell and run a program based on “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud” and be like OU, a winner, then to not cheat, run a clean program and end up being like the Ags, a loser. I mean, isn’t this the principle which made America the great country that it is. Otherwise, wouldn’t half of it still be Mexico and the other half still be populated by Sitting Bull and his circle of friends? And if this is so, then how can you Horns Up people be arrogant and high and mighty enough to think that you are immune from this same principle which governs all who comprise and live in the free market system? Sorry to inform you boys, but, you know, free market principles do not come with an exemption clause for Homo’s. Even on your knees, bent over, with your butt high up in the air, and with your mouth wide open, I’m afraid the free market principles still apply….sorry.

    As I said above, using “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud” to win and climb up the career ladder, the principle of success, this is as American as apple pie, freckles, and ordering nubile, first timer prostitutes off of craigslists. How could anyone living in this country in this day and age come to disagree with me on this? I’m afraid facts are facts, no matter whether you are a Sooner or a Homo Horns Up Horny Horn.

25. SoonTang said:

    May 15th, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    Horns Down, I’d like you to join Chaisson and I for a 3-some sometime. I’ll bring the tools.

26. Barry Switzer said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 4:13 am

    Horns Down- don’t waste your time with these idiots. Just admit that we cheat and tell them to gft. Next time we play we’ll hang half a hundred on them.

27. RansomStoddard said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 4:34 am

    Is it a coincidence that horns down shows up on the same day we learn the state of Oklahoma leads the nation in erectile dysfunction?

28. Newy25 said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 7:12 am

    “Better to cheat like hell and run a program based on “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud” and be like OU, a winner, then to not cheat, run a clean program and end up being like the Ags, a loser”

    Nice trailer park logic. How about this – better to play it clean, have a respectable program and win 3 BCS games while taking 3 of the last 4 from from a bunch of cheating, inbred rednecks?

29. roveram said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    horns down, nice attempt at appearing intellectual, however you fucking failed.

    Go burn a flag, run some meth, or protest some shit.

30. TTomTerrific said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 2:48 pm

    I was reading Horns Down’s post for a paragraph or two, but then this logging show came on the discovery channel.

31. horns down said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    “horns down, nice attempt at appearing intellectual, however you fucking failed.
    Go burn a flag, run some meth, or protest some shit.”

    Sorry, but I’m afraid that compared to your statement and it’s “duh duh” tone and content, I don’t just appear intellectual, I am intellectual. You see, unlike you or any Horns Up boy around here, I actually had the courage and the balls to put my ass on the line, put my argument forward, and to dare any of you Horns Up mental midgets meet my challenge and refute me, which if you haven’t noticed, the supposed representative’s of the best minds your oh so proud Lone Star state has to offer have, to a man, uniformally been either too cowardly, too mentally deficient, or too chickenshit, or all of the above, to do.

    But if it will make you feel any better, roverram, I’d say, from what I have seen so far from this Horns Up board, that you and your above statement would most certainly qualify as a fair representation of the best and brightest your Godforsaken state has to offer in terms of mental acuity and elite intellectualism.

32. TTomTerrific said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    The article speaks for itself, you have refuted nothing.

    When you fail to make a point, or anything approaching a point, that might make the original article seem inaccurate – instead you filibuster some blah, blah bullshit – you are not giving us a lot to work with.

    Maybe you should look for spelling errors, because you post sucked and it was painful to read.

33. TTomTerrific said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    Btw, is this happy couple still together?

    If not, this dude needs to spend the rest of his life looking over his shoulder for this little girl’s daddy.

    That’s the way things are done around here.

34. TTomTerrific said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 3:41 pm

    Sorry, I was talking about the screw driver bandit

    This pathetic reach of yours comparing Bomar being Stoops sacrificial lamb and capitalism doesn’t offer much more.

    The University of Texas’ athletic department does indeed make more money than any other athletic department, and if we ever jumped the shark and decided to flat out cheat, inviting OU into a spending war – OU wouldn’t win another game.

35. horns down said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 3:51 pm

    “Is it a coincidence that horns down shows up on the same day we learn the state of Oklahoma leads the nation in erectile dysfunction?”

    Impressive attempt at a pun there, Ransom. The monumental task of equating horns down with erectile dysfunction and then the work involved in putting that hard achieved identity in the context of the dynamics of the space/time equilibrium must have all but drained away all the ameoba like mental capacity your brain has to offer to humanity. Count me as one who is impressed – and it is truly impressive in actuality, quite an accomplishment, for a Horn of course and a native of Texas, but does little qualification need any mentioning. Just between you and me, I think not.

    By the way, just to imform, since I doubt if you would be the type who would know this from personal experience, you know the saying: the bigger they are, the harder they fall. That is true, but it is also equally true that the bigger they are the harder it is to get them up. I mean, what mofo can’t get it up if they happen to be no bigger than a mosquito bite.

    You see, my not so well endowed friend, when it comes to these types of experiences, it is quality that counts, not quantity: quality in terms of where it goes and how far it goes in its inquiry, and in terms these two qualities, believe me, the Oklahomian man takes a backseat to no one. And if you haven’t noticed, our recent state population boom seems to indicate that we have no problems or major issues in those when moments when it truly counts and we have to either put up or shut up.

    You see, with studies such as the above, its the interpretation that counts, and, of course, Ransom, your no so well endowed Horns Up ass couldn’t be expected to come up with the correct interpretation or the right conclusion in this subject area. You know what they say: there is no substitute for experience, and in this area of exploration, I have no doubts that you are a little, itty bitty deficient. So cheer up, Ransom, at least you have a plausible excuse going for you to explain for your failings on this matter. Rest assure, you certainly have my sympathy.

36. horns down said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Tom, you are lucky, I’ve got to go and walk my dog now, but, believe me, I’ll be back for you. Keep posting son, keep giving me stuff to work with.

37. roveram said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 3:57 pm

    Horns down dumb fuck, if you think money and capitalism are a flawed system, then you are stupidest mother fucker in the history of the intertron.

    Since we’re making assumptions, I’ll make some. I am five times more educated and intellectual than you.

    And I’m not in Texas.

    And fuck you and the sooners.

38. roveram said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    And you ramble like a fucking idiot.

    Make your point concisely and then shut the fuck up.

    Nobody here is impressed.

39. TTomTerrific said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

    Any chance that you could have the dog post here when you get back so there might be some tenable discussion?

40. roveram said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 4:28 pm

    Really.

    How long does it take to fuck a dog in the ass, sling some meth and get back to the computer to defend your intellectual honor?

    I don’t know.

41. horns down forever said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    “…if you think money and capitalism are a flawed system, then you are stupidest mother fucker in the history of the intertron.”

    “How long does it take to fuck a dog in the ass…”

    Na, I suspect that the “stupidest mother fucker in…” would be the guy making fucking dogs in the ass accusations on someone else when their self chosen, of their own free will and volition, internet namesake happens to be, you guessed it, “roveram”. Is it just me or am I the only one who has the wherewhithal to see a bit of irony in all of this.

    As I said above, and I will go to the trouble to repeat it for your obviously challenged, dog fucking ass: “you and your above statement would most certainly qualify as a fair representation of [what] the best and brightest [in] your Godforsaken state has to offer in terms of mental acuity and elite intellectualism”.

    Need I say more, “rover ram” (put that separation there to insure that even you would be able to comprehend my point and your gaffe). Hope that helps.

    And if you are indeed five times more intellectual that I, “rover ram”, then when you are not busy “rover ramming” your rover, please attempt to spare some time to state with some degree of specificity how capitalism and money are not flawed or how it does not represent a flawed system. Should be a cakewalk for a man of your obvious dog butt fucking, mental acuity.

    Oh, and if you should fail to respond, I suppose it would not take much imagination for the rest of us to guess what is taking up so much of your time as to render you, “rover ram”, utterly unable to respond in a satisfactory manner.

42. horns down forever said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 7:41 pm

    “Nice trailer park logic. How about this – better to play it clean, have a respectable program and win 3 BCS games while taking 3 of the last 4 from from a bunch of cheating, inbred rednecks?”

    Suppose this little attempt to say something is just some more of the same: just another example of what the best and brightest in the state of Texas has to offer in defense of their state honor, the legitimacy of their livelihood, and the integrity of their beloved football program.

    Newy25, I figure that by intellectual statements (for Texas standards) such as these: “Nice trailer park logic” and “a bunch of cheating, inbred rednecks”, you believed that you were actually saying something with substance and something which was insulting to OU football and the beloved state of Oklahoma. Unfortunately for you, you were doing nothing more than just spitting in your own face, essentially speaking….surprise, surprise, coming from a Horns Up Horn.

    Newy25, if what you are claiming to be truth, that one can win and actually still remain moral and clean, was to actually be possible in our world, then it should not require much of an intellect to realize that such a line of thought, if it were in fact the truth, would render the entirety of the life of man: all his history, every single one his religions and beliefs, everyone one of his personal relationships and families, and all of his and his ancestor’s sufferings, it would render all of the above, the entirety of mankind’s life on earth, as utterly meaningless and without a single point.

    All have to say is nice job, Newy25. And I bet you thought you were merely making just another one them small, smartassy, minor points against a hated state rival. Nope, Newy25, the thought from which your words originated may have been meager, but your words themselves, for those with eyes which can see, have taken on a life of their own and express a point, along with things about yourself, which is far beyond anything which you meant to say or wished to give away about yourself on a public forum.

    All I have to say once again is (and I know I sound like a broken record, but, blame yourselves, you Horns Up boys don’t give me much to work with): you and your above statement would most certainly qualify as a fair representation of [what] the best and brightest [in] your Godforsaken state has to offer in terms of mental acuity and elite intellectualism”.

    To be cont…. Yea, I’ll explain the how and the why’s of all this at later time. Right now, I have to once again check up on my doggie. Just gotta make sure that the infamous “rover ram” isn’t screwing with my pooch.

43. roveram said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    First of all idiot fucker, there’s not two r’s in my user name.

    And then walk out of the trailer and think to yourself, “How am I posting this dumb shit.”

    Did Obama and Chavez create the net and provide you a computer?

    Perhaps the evil money guys played a role.

    How was your dog’s ass?

44. TTomTerrific said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    I’m not sure that you know what “irony” means, but in case you do….ask Rover where he is from.

45. PatronSaint said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 8:13 pm

    If capitalism and our monetary policy aren’t flawed, then cheating in football is okay. Or isn’t okay. I can’t remember now.

    Dr. Joseph Dolan: Right. Now, how long have you had these pains, Mr. Barber?
    Fletch: No, that’s “Babar”.
    Dr. Joseph Dolan: Two B’s?
    Fletch: One B. B-A-B-A-R.
    Dr. Joseph Dolan: That’s two.
    Fletch: Yeah, but not right next to each other. I thought that’s what you meant.

46. roveram said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 8:39 pm

    Horn dick down, how about this: I challenge you to an intellectual fight. You’re a smart mother fucker, right? Capitalism sucks and you can prove it.

    It’ll take about five minutes. You’ll say some dumb shit and I’ll throw out some IS/LM curves, legal arguments and you’ll shut the fuck up.

    After that, the extradition process starts to send your ass to Little Rock.

47. Mr. Babar said:

    May 16th, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    You using the whole fist there, doc?

48. dutchie said:

    May 17th, 2009 at 11:39 am

    Horns Down… in many cases, perception is reality. Ponder that for a minute, especially when related to this article.

    I know it must be miserable, absolutely miserable, that your lengthy diatribes cannot possibly counteract the perception that Oklahoma is a baron wasteland of cheaters, meth addicts, and low class citizens. It must be an incredible injustice to know that intellectuals such as yourself (which, if your prowess on a sports blog is any indication, are plentiful in the great state of Oklahoma), are thought of as marginally superior to community college graduates in the world of academia.

    On a more serious note, I am a fervent supporter of capitalism, but one of the most frequent arguments against capitalism is that there will always be someone willing to exploit the system, willing to do anything for a buck. I think you may have been confused, as you tried to use the “anything goes in capitalism” mentality to support your point that bribery should be acceptable in college football. Typically when constructing a logical argument that uses a metaphor, you would want to use a positive attribute of the item referenced to support a point, and a negative attribute of the item referenced to disprove a point, not the other way around. While I understand that the “anything goes” mentality in relation to capitalism may actually be a positive attribute to some, it would certainly characterize that person as morally suspect. Barry Switzer would be proud.

49. TTomTerrific said:

    May 17th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    Have you found a cogent, concise, pertinent argument for either the screw driver thing or the Bomar deal…..or just more jumbled wording leading all of us confused?

    I would really like to know…if there is an intelligent Sooner….how he or she would truly argue this as acceptable…..either one.

50. TxTower said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 6:35 am

    I stopped at “foundational principle” Is that like “strategery”? Clearly horns down has an overly inflated opinion of himself, his sooners and his prose.

51. Charley Whitman said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 7:13 am

    I for one am proud of my little fellow Texan for going up to goonerland and cheating. It shows his good upbringing.

52. horns down reborn said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    “Typically when constructing a logical argument that uses a metaphor, you would want to use a positive attribute of the item referenced to support a point, and a negative attribute of the item referenced to disprove a point, not the other way around.”

    “On a more serious note, I am a fervent supporter of capitalism”

    “as you tried to use the “anything goes in capitalism” mentality to support your point that bribery should be acceptable in college football”

    Douchie, do you really think your limp response did anything to refute my position? As I said before and I am forced all you all’s native Texas stupidity to repeat it once more: you and your above statement would most certainly qualify as a fair representation of [what] the best and brightest [in] your Godforsaken state has to offer in terms of mental acuity and elite intellectualism”.

    I have to admit, the level of native stupidity displayed by the set of posts above, has surprised even me to an extent. To restate my point with the hopes that you all may at some point understand it: it was not that the corrupt ethic inherent in capitalism justifies cheating in college football; rather, it was that the whole premise at the core of capitialism was, is, and always will be corrupt, down its very bones. My point was that it is not possible, as a matter of principle, EVER to “win” and still be “clean”, as you Horns Up boys like to put it, and is not this premise and the belief in its possibility the basic, fundamental premise behind the idea of capitalism itself? – both as to its feasibility and its legitimacy.

    And if winning and being clean is not possible, as a matter of reality and due to its necessities, if that combination never comes to amount to anything more than a hopeful illusion in the minds of pro-capitalistic dupes and douchie bags, then how could anyone, even a native, dim-witted Texan, then say that it is stretch to apply this eternal truism to the world of college football and to even your beloved Longhorn football program. What? Are you, douchie, attempting to say that the Longhorn program is exempt from the necessities of reality, from reality itself?

    In short, to make it simple, I am saying that any program or anybody that wins on God’s green earth cannot be “clean” and “moral” at the same time, not even on the pee wee level if one wants to be nit-picky about it (no point in it), but most certainly, not in the big business environment of college football, and, on this level, being nit-picky is no requirement to find all the “lies, illegal inducements and outright fraud” which will always drive a winning program. All you need is either open eyes, or a brain which is not flooded with pro-capitalist, “dum dum” delusions.

53. horns down reborn said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    “First of all idiot fucker, there’s not two r’s in my user name.”

    Why does this statement ring eerily similar to my ears as Clinton’s infamous and deceitful sayings: “I didn’t inhale” or his finger wagging “I never had sex with that women” denial (and of course in a technical sense he did not, you know, the concept of plausible denial).

    Yea, I admit, not having two R’s (as if it really makes a damn difference to the real meaning displayed by your name), as with Clinton above, may serve as a plausible denial, but seeing how you seem to have been too busy to come up with a satisfactory defense of Capitialism, as was requested of you, and seeing how this deficiency could not possibly due to your lacking of intelligence – no, certainly not you, roveram – then it seems we are left with only one possible conclusion: that you just suck dog ass as a speller. Dog fuckers typically do, unless, of course, they happen to be of continental Indian descent. So it seems that would explain the mystery of the missing “R” in “roverram”. Just call me Sherlock “Horn Down” Holmes for future reference.

54. horns down "T. Boone and Ted Turner can kiss my sorry ass" said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    to be cont….

    Okay, back to the beat down of Newy25 and all those like him, which, by the way, would comprise just about all those on these boards and just about everyone in this country and the whole of the modern world, in fact.

    To be brief, the reason why the belief that “winning” can be united with “morality” and “being clean” denies the life of man meaning is for the simple fact that such a combination would deny man of the possibility of what is known as “free will”. You see, if winning and morality could truly go together, it would render life too easy. Then life would amount to and degenerate into nothing higher than a mere cake walk in the park, to some superficial form of fatalistic, materialistic hedonism.

    What is so wrong with such a scenario, you say? Well, if this were the case, than the highest expression of moral purity and belief in man would amount to nothing higher than the well to do doctor in his white, sanctimonious cloak, or the lawyer in his fancy smancy suit and tie, or the CEO with his plastic wife, his jet planes and his winning persona. In other words, the highest ethic in man, the highest he could hope to evolve into would be a man who claims to be moral and wise due to mere circumstance and social position, the moral man of circumstance.

    And while morality by circumstance maybe highly socially approved, admired, and desired (Lord knows how you Horns Up boys love to brag about it with regard to your B.S. football program, always saying how you all are morally superior to everyone else because you all are fortunate enough to be in a position which requires no cheating or bending of the rules to win – a position which by the way, as I have been saying over and over again, is an impossibility due to the nature of reality, as I will go on to show), it is in the end, let us all admit it, a very low, vulgar, and unreliable expression of true morality, and to assert that it could be the highest ethic man could attain, as it would be if winning and morality could be united, is to blasphemy everything that was and still is genuine, sincere, and sacred in the life of man and of the whole history and destiny mankind.

    To say that a man could refer to himself as moral and a winner in life merely because he has bothered to waste his youth away remembering innane biological facts and terms, or because he has learned the art of the wheel and deal, the art of how to convince others that you are sincere when in fact you are not, or because, as is the case with most CEO’s, he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth is what ethics in a capitalistic society devolves and decays into – just look around at our world today, if one needs any proof of this. Morality by circumstance simply assets that it is more moral than others because it has amassed enough money (typically by deceit [by blatant means or more subtle systematic ones] and immoral means) to the point where it no longer feels it is subject to the same level of desperation and need which forces others, the more lowly in society, to feel the pressure, the temptation of immorality and which causes them to commit such acts of immorality in their acts of desperation.

    And it is simply just this slight difference in morality – note how no one really claims that their moral natures are actually truly different, and how instead they merely focus on socially disapproved acts – which provides all the impetus for all that phoney moral arrogance and vapid self-righteousness typically displayed by the above mentioned groups against those who are less fortunate.

    And the above scenario – that of the more fortunate higher classes lording their moral superiority over the lower – would the highest moral expression of man in a world where morality and winning could be, in fact, united and combined. I’d say it’s a pretty sick and ridiculous situation, and especially so, when one remembers that just about everyone who achieved their morality by circumstance did so through immoral and unsavory means – and whether it was by outwardly acts in the open or it never expressed itself beyond the dishonesty and insincerity at the level of the heart, makes, I’d say, little difference on the matter.

    The above scenario would be the result if winning and morality or cleanliness could be unified, and the moral free will of man denied. And so we should all be grateful that such a combination has been ruled out by the laws and the nature of the universe. And to note this fact: we all know without much mental exertion that those all claims to morality by circumstance is illusory – I mean, just remember the B.S. natures of types of people I mentioned above, we do happen to meet them in the real world after all – and just as this must be so, so must the belief that winning and morality can ever be united in a combination, for both types of realities always go hand in hand and walk together side by side. The two realities are both born tied at the hips. Sorry, Horns Up boys, such a combination can never be more than an illusion within a person of a corrupt heart and a deluded mind.

    to be cont…. on the mythic level

55. douche bag alert said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    Hello, this is DBA calling for Mr. Barking Carnival. Due to a recent upturn in usage, we are terminating your contract. We no longer have the resources to monitor your site. Thank you, and good luck in the future.

56. horns down reborn said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    I am gay and proud of it

57. horns down in the house said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 7:44 pm

    “douche bag alert”

    Is that you, Douchie? Or is it, rancid stutterer? Anyway no matter, since both of you are nothing more than born Horns Up losers.

    Sounds as if someone is becoming emotionally unglued and irrationally bitter due to all the beat downs he has suffered at the hands of Horns Down, aka the Okie with the mighty big Pokie, erectile dysfunction notwithstanding.

58. BEHorn said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    And after all this, blowU still sucks.

    And cheats.

59. TTomTerrific said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    did ANYBODY read all of that?

60. roveram said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    Why do you UT guys not ban this ‘horns down, bastard?

    HD: I’ll reiterate. I asked a simple question as to how you’re posting your idiotic shit on the internet.

    Did you find that computer on the Ho Chi Minh trail?

    Or maybe capitalists played a part.

    btw – good job on capitalizing capitalism when it’s not required.

    Is it possible to keep your dumb fucking posts below a 1000 words?

61. horns down "The Defender of the Faith" said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 9:06 pm

    to be continued….

    To continue with the beat down of Newy25 and all those like him, part III.

    I really wonder how it could be that people are typically unable to see that the unity of winning and morality always results in a denial of free will? It is so clear and so very easy for me, Horns Down, to see, why is it so difficult for you oh so, high and mighty moral Horns Up boys to see it, Hmmmm? And to show how easy is to see, just think of this question: If winning and morality could be unified, then what would be point of what we call “free will”? Doesn’t having free will imply that there must be an option for us to choose from?

    Now if winning and morality could be one, ask your phoney baloney moral selves this question: then what exactly could free will have to choose from, what exactly would it then be good for? – picking between diet or regular soda, or between picking your nose with your pinkie finger or your middle one? Obviously these less essential and life defining choices are not what was meant to be meant by the term of free will.

    To further illustrate: if winning could actually be one with morality, then free will would be like a dick born into a world without any pussy. It would simply have nowhere to go and nothing to choose from. Hopefully, the lonely penis analogy illustrates how the gut wrenching and life changing choices, which free will demands and what it is known for, is due solely because winning and morality/cleanliness are, in fact, always utterly separate and can never ever be combined in any form or manner whatsoever. Does it need to be said that free will is always associated with sacrifice? What need would we have to sacrifice or what essential, invaluable aspect of ourselves could we sacrifice if we could be moral and win at the same time?

    And so here we can see easily the true nature of the intoxicating allure of capitalism and its ethic that one can win and be moral at the same. It allows a person the fantasy, the illusion that he can go through life without making the sacrifice which is demanded of him by free will. In short, it gives him an out, an easy, convenient, pre-packaged and a spineless on his knees type of way out from the choice which would define what type of man he truly is and what type of metal he truly is made from.

    Instead, this illusion of the coward, the man who allows himself the ghey ass luxury of being moral by circumstance, promises him that he does not have to face his choice, to make his decision, to face the loss of his sacrifice, and, yet, miraculously, he can still come out of it in the end as moral, just so long as he utterly sells himself out to be another cog in a corrupt system and so long as he is devious, miserly, and calculating enough to cheat the system and his neighbors, along the way to amassing enough money to cover himself and his sins with the moral appearing garments of the morality of circumstance. In short, the unity of winning with morality and the whole ethic of morality by circumstance, is simply some voodoo like technique that sneaky modern man has created to allow himself to semi-believe that he is moral, to appear to others as if he is unquestionably moral when, in fact, he is inwardly the very opposite of all of the above. When, in fact and in truth, he is about as immoral and as much of a craven coward as it is possible for a human being to be.

    You see, morality by circumstance has always been known by another name and that would be: the wolf in sheep’s clothing, the two faced man, the man who only cares about the social face, or what we commonly refer to, in everyday terms, as the con artist. In a world where the ethic of capitalism is accepted as the social norm, as ours is, one can know one thing and it is this: that we are truly living in the age of the wolf in sheep’s clothing, the era of the con man, and, as I keep saying over and over again, I am afraid, Horns Up boys, that not even your beloved, outwardly cleanly football program can be exempted from this ubiquitous, universal, and dominant principle which runs through all of what we call the modern age.

    to be cont…. and this time I will reach the mythic level

62. horns down "The Man Stooping Down to Answer to the Common, Riff Raff Type of People" said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 9:11 pm

    “Is it possible to keep your dumb fucking posts below a 1000 words?”

    Don’t count the # of words, son. I just know I have something to say and a position and a type of man I have to utterly demolish and destroy. But do not worry, I will not be around here forever. I only have one more post to go which will probably not be too long and then I will going off on a long hiatus.

63. roveram said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    How about this?

    Post your moronic diatribe and gtfo.

64. SoonTang said:

    May 18th, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    horns down

    You haven’t gotten laid in a while…it fairly obvious.

65. RansomStoddard said:

    May 19th, 2009 at 3:27 am

    My favorite is when he spelled “barren” “baron”. Just classic sooner.

66. PatronSaint said:

    May 19th, 2009 at 5:27 am

    I see he’s dropped the nonsense gauntlet.

    Here is my response: The duality of the common man with his ethos and free will conspire to deny the obtuseness of the veracity of life of the indigent and the oligarchy in the realpolitik of the neo-nationalistic…

    Eh, I can’t compete.

67. Spring Branch Horn said:

    May 19th, 2009 at 5:46 am

    Marty is that you?

68. horns down "The Man, The Myth, The Legend" said:

    May 19th, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    “conspire to deny the obtuseness of the veracity of life”

    PatronSaint, tell me how anything I have said above would qualify as “nonsense gauntlet”. Should be very easy for a man who displays the confidence and the self assurance to summarily dismiss all of what I have said with a mere one liner and a shake of the head. Given the amount I have wrote, surely, a man of your intellect, as your attitude above seems to be asserting, would have no trouble picking out just a few things by which you could specifically point out as an example of this “nonsense” you talk about.

    Now why do suspect that you will fail to respond to this challenge, aside from one of your typical run and hide, smart ass, meaningless one liners?

    You know what they say in erectile dysfunctional Oklahoma: either put up or shut up.

    And by the way, if you cannot comprehend all that I have written above, then you, sir, certainly do not qualify to be referred to as a “saint”. And I will go one to show you why, which, by the way, is something you run and hide, one liner, dum dum Horns Up boys always seem to fail to even to attempt to do, not even one single try, not even one single example of it.

69. horns down "The Man, The Myth, The Legend" said:

    May 19th, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    “You haven’t gotten laid in a while…it fairly obvious.”

    This from a guy who chooses to name himself, SoonTang, on public forum. Yea, with a winning taste in style as that and as joe cool as your namesake seems to say about you, I’m sure the ladies just can get enough of that SoonTang.

    In fact, I almost never met a hottie who did not tell me how much she couldn’t resist SoonTang. Yup, and every guy I have ever known who was named, SoonTang, turned out to be an all time ladies killer and an ultimate stud. Yea, and I’m sure everyone else on this board has experienced the same thing, day in and day out, and would all agree that all of above conforms without question to what we know as reality. Yea, that sure is a likely scenario, SoonTang.

    Anyway, what the hell is a SoonTang? Is it some gutteral, slutty version of PoonTang?

70. horns down "The Man, The Myth, The Legend" said:

    May 19th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    “My favorite is when he spelled “barren” “baron”. Just classic sooner.”

    Ah man, don’t really remember doing that, but if I goofed, then I goofed. Anyway, if I did so nice put down, considering it’s from you, rancid stutterer.

    Now do you have any substantive criticisms to offer aside from a spelling mistake?

71. horns down "The Man, The Myth, The Legend" said:

    May 19th, 2009 at 8:34 pm

    to be cont….

    to continue with the beat down, part IV….

    If one has followed me so far, I believe I have shown with a fair degree of clarity that free will cannot exist if winning and morality/cleanliness were to be unified. In fact, on a simple minded and practical level, that would be a fairly effective definition of what free will actually is: that it is the act of utterly and qualitatively separating morality from the concept of winning. This act and choice is what free will is and is how it comes to be.

    Now why is this so important? Well, free will in the life of man is the core of what he is, it is what allows him to define himself. On an abstract level, free will basically signifies the sun, the life of the universe coursing through the veins of man. In fact, free will is what essentially separates all living things from what is dead or not living. All living organisms are alive only because they partake of the reality of free will.

    And this would be why the modern world today has come to be defined by its sense of fatalism, if anyone has noticed. To deny free will, as the modern world does with its unity of winning and morality, is to separate, sort of speak, man from his “sun” and to condemn him to live within the boundaries of fatalism, with the unshakable sense that all which is around him is, in the end, ultimately a mere illusion. One could say that Stoicism is just an extremely responsible and organized form of hedonistic fatalism, whereas decadence amounts to be no more than the disorganized and irresponsible version of that same form of hedonistic fatalism. Bi-polarity could be said to be this form of hedonistic fatalism, but which is desperate and can never make up its mind about where it stands. And what I am saying is that all this is a direct result of us living in a world in which morality is combined with winning. It is a deadly combination and free will, our sun, will not exist in such a deceitful environment.

    Now the question may arise as to whether I am over exaggerating the situation, but, unfortunately, let me assure you I am not. To put all this another way, what does it mean for free will not to exist in world where winning and morality is unified? If there is no free will or genuine choice, then can morality exist there at all? I believe the answer would be no. Whereever free will does not exist, true morality cannot exist either. It means that whereever you see morality and winning combined, no true morality exists there at all, and it also means that all those people who claim to be moral in that way, you know, the upper crust of society, the morality of circumstance, have no real connection at all to any true form of morality. It means, to put it frankly, that they have almost no earthly idea what a true and genuine morality is or even what it feels like.

    The question then becomes: if no true morality exists in a the world which unites the ethic of winning with morality, then what exactly is this morality of circumstance which they pretend to display in such a world?

    to be cont…. thinking about giving this up cause it just taking too damn long.

72. Long story short said:

    May 19th, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    Someone enjoyed their freshman philosophy class and needs their sophomoric ass kicked and laid in either order.

    “…it was ’tis but a piece of cake.”

    fail

73. AZLonghorn said:

    May 20th, 2009 at 1:56 am

    I’ve been reading the blogs and more importantly the comments on this site for a while now. It’s just good shit that is generally intelligent and makes me laugh my ass off, but I have to admit my hero on this site is the least likely of you all. It’s you Horns Down. You are by far the biggest fucking idiot I have ever read a post by. You prove any and every point I’ve ever made about Oklahoma being the asshole of this country; you solidify my long-standing belief that TX, CO, KS, MO, and even Arkansas should give up an area two miles deep into their borders to build a canal around the shitstain that is your state, the National Guard would of course patrol these waters and execute any inbreeders on sight (some instances of friendly fire may be unavoidable in AR).

    You sound like someone who had their Uncle Daddy tell them how smart they were for far too long. Nothing you spout is vaguely intellectual. On the basic level your posts are filled with misspellings and grammatical errors. Then there’s the readily apparent lack of anything resembling a coherent thought process. Then on a philosophical and moral level you confirm what I had already guessed to be true…you’re just a bunch of dumbass, lying, cheating, sister fucking idiots. If we annihilated Oklahoma tomorrow, our standing in the world would be exponentially higher the day after. So you are my hero Horns Down for being the living proof that I am not a hateful, cynical, arrogant Texan…you okies really are a bunch of fucking idiots and I can continue educating the rest of the world (for it’s own good) without any doubts or regrets.

74. AZLonghorn said:

    May 20th, 2009 at 2:03 am

    “You know what they say in erectile dysfunctional Oklahoma: either put up or shut up.”

    I thought it was “put out, or the sheep will.”

75. Texoz said:

    May 20th, 2009 at 5:07 am

    This thread has gone goatse.

76. BEHorn said:

    May 20th, 2009 at 5:40 am

    “Brevity is the soul of wit.”
    ~ William Shakespeare (”Hamlet”, Act 2, Scene 2)

77. PatronSaint said:

    May 20th, 2009 at 7:28 am

    “tl;dr”
    ~ PatronSaint

78. Shorthorn Way said:

    May 20th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    Yes, Bomar and OU got caught in a pay for no work deal…..but you sips forget about the volunteer baseball coach Trip Couch forgetting to go to his $40,000 job with Lieberman over at Centex Beverages in 2002…..what was the penalty — 2 years probation and loss of a scholarship. Living in glass houses, throwing those stones.

79. SoonTang said:

    May 20th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    Hey ass…I am a female, and I am a Sooner fan. Pathetic soul you are mister!

80. horns down "The Finale" said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.”

81. horns down "The Finale" said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.”

82. horns down "The Finale" said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    “Brevity is the soul of wit.”

    Yes, I agree, but what I have been seeking to do, I believe, is beyond wit and beyond anything Shakespeare attempted to do, God rest his soul (actually if one reads me with comprehension, then one may see that I have done what he was not able to do and grasped firmly what he could only grasp limply and with vagueness. Do admit his style was a world’s better than mine [sorry but I'm not a fag and fags just have us hetero's beat in the style department - has been that way since the beginning of time], but, probably, not his thought. On the level of thought, I suspect I can more than hold my own with the dead man. For instance, I do know this: his famous “to be or not to be” is a protypical example of a false dichotomy, an erroneous understanding of the nature of “being”. By the way, that would be why no one has been able to answer it in a final and conclusive manner, in one way or other. Only an erroneous mind, such as the typical modern mind of today, would make such a statement and believe it to be valid question.)

83. Theodore Kaczynski said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

84. John Hinckley said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    I’m writing all this stuff down so I can send it to Jodie Foster.

85. Tom Cruise said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    I have found my new religion.

86. Howard Hughes said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    Reading your lucid prose makes me feel the same way I did the first time I saw Jane Russell’s tits.

    I cut my fingernails just so I could type that.

87. horns down "The Finale" said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 3:29 pm

    “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.”

    “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.”

88. horns down "The Finale" said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 3:34 pm

    You guys….always the coy jokers….but your flattery will get you all no where with me, just more beat downs. Flattery will get you no where with Horns Down.

89. horns down "Riding on the Wings of the Phoenix" said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    “Reading your lucid prose makes me feel the same way I did the first time I saw Jane Russell’s tits.”

    Thank you, I have always wondered about my style, and, in a way, I do agree that my writing would qualify as lucid. Few in the world could have written on this topic with the same level of clarity and brevity which I have displayed so far.

    Not sure about a Jane Russell tit analogy though. I would say my style is more like an extremely quiet and smooth jack hammer with an eternal power source. The logic of my thought is endless; it just keeps coming and coming, in an endless series of unassuming waves, quietly and patiently destroying any and all opposition which stands in front it or which dares to stand in its way from its goals.

90. horns down "Riding on the Wings of the Phoenix" said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 9:26 pm

    “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

91. horns down "Riding on the Wings of the Phoenix" said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 9:29 pm

    “Blueshorn: Where are the enablers from ousux? We need some spin, baby!”

    Was that enough spin for you, Blueshorn? Or are you looking for some more beat down?

92. AZLonghorn said:

    May 21st, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    Do they hand out the acid along with your freshman philosophy books at OU?

93. Phil Spector said:

    May 22nd, 2009 at 6:10 am

    That dude is smoother than Manischewitz.

94. David Koresh said:

    May 22nd, 2009 at 6:22 am

    I could hole up all day reading that dude’s writing.

95. flamingmonkeyass said:

    May 22nd, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    “Horns down” – Your very premise is wrong. To seek out a moral higher ground while maintaining success on a physical level does not nulify the meaning of life, but instead is the very definition of life. High morality is not mutally exclusive from winning as you so feebly suggest in your aimless, mindless, pathetic wonderings. The two are wound together in the fabric and tapestry of reality. To achieve success with out a guiding moral compass is to forgo true success. Means obtained by soiled ends are no longer the same means as those earned through righteous work. They are instead a different beast. One ugly and fraught with the hollow and empty despair of falsehood. Something an oklahoma native is probably very familiar with.

    No indeed life and at its root success, is the courageous attempt of man to achieve high degress of success whilst trying to stay morally righteous. This is a good definition of life – this persuit of beauty. Kant might have something to say on this subject. He’s sort of a philospher. You probably would have heard of him if you hadn’t spend the end of your first semester on this blog pontificating your quasi-philosophical bullshit. Anyway, getting back to kicking your ass, your style, beauty is the goal of life. Beauty is only obtained by winning through a moral means. The apex of winning, and the piety of an institution, are not mutally exclusive as you have suggested. Being an ou follower I’m sure you’d love if this was the case. The data obviously suggests otherwise. Your university has proven itself loose in regards to morals in comparison to most other university in regards to breaking the rules followed by other university in accordance with an agreed upon set of laws and bylaws, i.e. the NCAA. History bears this ought and Bob Stoops seems hell bent on keeping with traditions. Further it can be established that the perception of ou is one of a school who lacks moral fiber, one who does not understand the “correct” way of doing things, and one that abides in weak morals. Since perception is one of the ways beauty presents itself it can only be concluded then that perception itself is a form of reality. Thus ou is to morals what a dirty old whore is to sex. Complete with crabs.

    Yet despite its complete lack of concern over its horrendous moral history and current perception, ou’s athletic department and football team pales in comparison, during any routine year, to that of the vastly morally superior University of Texas. Your football team has a losing record against the Longhorns. In truth it is not inconsiderable. Your team has lost 3 of the last 4, soon to be 4 of the last 5, and had its dirty, slutty ass kicked last October. The other parts of your athletic department are so far inferior to UT’s it is almost a waste to even mention them. The point being that UT strives for beauty (the very meaning of life) by plying their trade with a morally sound approach; and they see better results on the field, and can feel better about those results as a circumstance of being righteous.

    Thus you’ll have to excuse us Longhorns if we don’t have a little chuckle when your school’s lack of understanding the true path of winning, the correct path, produces such gems as Bomar; that always invariably come back to haunt your tainted program. It is after all our right as a morally superior program.

96. flamingmonkeyass said:

    May 22nd, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    P.S.

    Anyone can wax philosophical, but when they don’t know what they’re saying (You) they come across as some kind of high meth lab worker. I’d be almost willing to put money down that in your case, that’d be spot on.

    You know how I can tell losing to us bothers you? Because you’re here. I’ve never found myself on a ou site. I’d be too worried about catching whatever the fuck it is you have.

    3 out 4.

    Hook’em

97. Flamingmonkeyass said:

    May 23rd, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    Wow almost 24 hours and no long winded response. Guess that means you’re bowing down. Not surprising given that you probably spend a lot of time on your knees. Of course I’ve never had to cook with a hot plate so maybe it just takes that long to cook a frozen pizza. Never had a frozen pizza before now that I think about it.

    3 out of 4.

    Hook’em

Leave a Reply