<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spring Game Post-Mortem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/</link>
	<description>Texas Longhorns and sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:43:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LonghornScott</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43096</link>
		<dc:creator>LonghornScott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43096</guid>
		<description>There is plenty of time for one of the younger DTs to develop between now and a bowl game.  The bowl practices are probably the best portion of the season for development, in fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is plenty of time for one of the younger DTs to develop between now and a bowl game.  The bowl practices are probably the best portion of the season for development, in fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HenryJames</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43062</link>
		<dc:creator>HenryJames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43062</guid>
		<description>I certainly think we&#039;ll be in the BCS again, but I have no idea if the team we play will require us to have another DT or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly think we&#8217;ll be in the BCS again, but I have no idea if the team we play will require us to have another DT or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nth Handle</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43048</link>
		<dc:creator>Nth Handle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 04:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43048</guid>
		<description>The rest of the schedule is manageable without [a good second DT]?

So you don&#039;t think we will get to the BCS again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rest of the schedule is manageable without [a good second DT]?</p>
<p>So you don&#8217;t think we will get to the BCS again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy McCaffrey</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43039</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy McCaffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43039</guid>
		<description>Can Russell Carter be Maurice Gordon?  Dude passes the eyeball test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Russell Carter be Maurice Gordon?  Dude passes the eyeball test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justaguy</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43038</link>
		<dc:creator>justaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43038</guid>
		<description>From what I have been told Jarvis is out for this year recovering with the hope he comes back in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I have been told Jarvis is out for this year recovering with the hope he comes back in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retrobater</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43037</link>
		<dc:creator>retrobater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43037</guid>
		<description>What is the status of Jarvis Humphrey?  Any remote chance he
can show up by fall drills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the status of Jarvis Humphrey?  Any remote chance he<br />
can show up by fall drills?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justaguy</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43034</link>
		<dc:creator>justaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43034</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t disagree about Christian being better than Keenan. Just don&#039;t know if Gideon is better than either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree about Christian being better than Keenan. Just don&#8217;t know if Gideon is better than either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horncasting</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43033</link>
		<dc:creator>Horncasting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43033</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nickel allows us to put Christian Scott on the field, and I’ll wager that he will be better against the run that whomever our third linebacker would be.&quot;

I guess I was hoping Scott would be one of the two starting safeties and the tradeoff would be between a 4-3 with Robinson vs. nickel with Gideon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nickel allows us to put Christian Scott on the field, and I’ll wager that he will be better against the run that whomever our third linebacker would be.&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess I was hoping Scott would be one of the two starting safeties and the tradeoff would be between a 4-3 with Robinson vs. nickel with Gideon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kafka</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43022</link>
		<dc:creator>Kafka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43022</guid>
		<description>Four wide is OK if you have at least a couple of wideouts who can block an LB.  It is hard to run without decent blocking.  If you can not run well, the D can just play nickel, blitz the passer relentlessly and dare you to run.

If you can&#039;t punish a nickel D by running, then you lose a lot (most?) of the advantage of the hurry up offense.  

You can&#039;t always pass effectively.  Sometimes the weather does not cooperate (we see the effect of wind on the horns&#039; passing attack, rain or snow probably does not help much either).  Sometimes the opposition will be much better defending the pass than the run.

DT still sounds like a big worry.  In addition to OkState, OU usually runs well and UT could easily face a strong running team in the bowl game.

I could see the horns playing a nickel even against running teams.  If you DBs like Christian Scott who really hit and tackle well, the nickel may defend the run just as well as a 4-3.  One advantage of staying in a nickel all the time (if you have a good run support secondary) is that the hurry up offense becomes much easier to defend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four wide is OK if you have at least a couple of wideouts who can block an LB.  It is hard to run without decent blocking.  If you can not run well, the D can just play nickel, blitz the passer relentlessly and dare you to run.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t punish a nickel D by running, then you lose a lot (most?) of the advantage of the hurry up offense.  </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t always pass effectively.  Sometimes the weather does not cooperate (we see the effect of wind on the horns&#8217; passing attack, rain or snow probably does not help much either).  Sometimes the opposition will be much better defending the pass than the run.</p>
<p>DT still sounds like a big worry.  In addition to OkState, OU usually runs well and UT could easily face a strong running team in the bowl game.</p>
<p>I could see the horns playing a nickel even against running teams.  If you DBs like Christian Scott who really hit and tackle well, the nickel may defend the run just as well as a 4-3.  One advantage of staying in a nickel all the time (if you have a good run support secondary) is that the hurry up offense becomes much easier to defend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uthookem</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2009/04/05/spring-game-post-mortem/comment-page-1/#comment-43016</link>
		<dc:creator>uthookem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/?p=4407#comment-43016</guid>
		<description>As long as we don&#039;t spot Okie State 30 fucking points and free west Texas wind energy, then I say we take &#039;em down.

Hook &#039;em!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as we don&#8217;t spot Okie State 30 fucking points and free west Texas wind energy, then I say we take &#8216;em down.</p>
<p>Hook &#8216;em!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
