Connect with your Facebook Account

• Contact

Baseball Articles

18

College Baseball and Manufacturing Runs – Quick Followup

Posted by Huckleberry on March 16th, 2009 under Baseball

In my previous post on this topic, I looked at overall scoring by game situation both for the nation as a whole and the 2008 Texas team. I then looked at what we can learn from that information as far as the decisions to bunt or steal.

In the discussion that followed that post, I offered to follow up with an analysis of the runner on first and no out situations we faced last year. One of the commenters asked that I look at the winning percentage based on the decision, so I included that information in this analysis.

In 2008, we faced 129 such situations (in the games that have their box scores posted on texassports.com). We bunted in 34 of the situations, which yielded 19 innings in which we scored for a total of 40 runs. We did not attempt a bunt in 95 of the situations, which yielded 57 innings in which we scored for a total of 137 runs.

Bunting –> 1.18 runs per inning at a 55.9% scoring rate; 0.647 winning percentage resulted
Not bunting –> 1.44 runs per innings at a 60.0% scoring rate; 0.653 winning percentage resulted

To be frank, I find the winning percentage result somewhat uninformative because of standard variance during a season. As I stated previously, winning is just as much about pitching and defense as it is about offense. Exactly as much, not more Mr. Sportscaster Cliché Guy.

Anyway, the important thing to note is how well our results line up with our calculations from the previous exercise. Bunting cost our team about 1/4 of a run and resulted in a lower scoring rate. This seems to be a fairly predictable result in the modern college baseball environment.

I took one more step and eliminated the games against “lower quality” competition. I took out situations against Alabama A&M, Sam Houston St., TAMU-CC, Texas Southern, Texas St., UTA, UTPA, and UTSA. Yes, we lost to UTA and UTSA last year in mid-week games. Doesn’t change the point.

Against the other opponents, the results were:

Bunting –> 1.11, 55.6%; 0.593
Not Bunting –> 1.32, 61.6%; 0.603

A little odd that the scoring rates were up, but the runs per inning and winning percentage were down, which makes sense.

Once again, this was all by hand and so there may be an error here or there, but the point is the general trends. In the interest of full disclosure, this study had a fairly small sample size for an analysis like this. For example, if one of the bunt situations had resulted in a 6-run inning that in reality yielded a scoreless frame, then bunting would have produced more runs per inning. I hope to be able to add this season to the study for a larger sample size and if so will release the updated findings at the end of the year.

A final note: Augie doesn’t bunt as often in this situation as I thought he did. This both surprised and pleased me. Furthermore, his bunt rate was lower against better teams. Does he have an innate understanding that bunting isn’t as wise as he lets on? Or will the bunt rate go way up without Kyle Russell in the middle of the order?

Article Tags:

,

More from this Barker


Share This

  • StumbleUpon

18 Responses

  1. Truck's Son said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 7:17 am

    You need to bring this exercise back to around the 2000 season to be honest about what your analyzing. What were the numbers during our Omaha run vs the numbers in 06 through 08?

  2. ed said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 8:01 am

    What you write is informative; it also fails to take into consideration issues like who was batting in these situations, who was pitching, and what the fielding capabilities of the opponent were. Also the score at the time.

    My view is that the bunt tells your own players “one run is the goal.” Playing for the big inning seems a better way to win. Outs are precious; don’t hand the other team one, make them EARN all three outs.

  3. Huckleberry said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 8:32 am

    Truck’s Son -

    I would love to be honest. Do you happen to have the play-by-play of all Texas baseball games from 2000 to 2008?

    ed –

    Such a specific analysis might be interesting, but it would be pretty much useless due to limited data. If I want to compile the information to determine the best decision when a batter with a .350-.375 OBP, .450-.475 SLG, and bunting skill of 6 on a scale from 2-8 is facing a right-handed pitcher with a K/BB ratio of 2.5-2.7, with a defense with a ground ball fielding percentage of 0.970-0.975 when down by one run in the ninth inning, I’m probably going to be left with so few data points as to make the results meaningless.

    The information we do have tells us that you better have a really good reason to bunt because the base scenario tells you it’s a shitty idea. Essentially, you have to justify a decision to bunt, not so much a decision not to bunt.

    And, of course, I’m completely on board with the idea that the out is the most precious commodity an offense has. Certainly more valuable than one base in runner position in nearly all situations.

  4. Joe Morgan said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 9:47 am

    If I want to compile the information to determine the best decision when a batter with a .350-.375 OBP, .450-.475 SLG, and bunting skill of 6 on a scale from 2-8 is facing a right-handed pitcher with a K/BB ratio of 2.5-2.7, with a defense with a ground ball fielding percentage of 0.970-0.975…

    That’s nice, but you’ve ignored the most important factors: cosistancy, heart and intangibles.

  5. Huckleberry said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 10:04 am

    Nice. Love the consinstancy cosistentsy concisstancy cosistancy reference.

  6. Truck's Son said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    Sacrifice hits in the Augie era:

    1997 – 50
    1998 – 63
    1999 – 54
    2000 – 126
    2001 – 91
    2002 – 46
    2003 – 97
    2004 – 96
    2005 – 116
    2006 – 95
    2007 – 76
    2008 – 64

  7. Huckleberry said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 10:38 am

    So we won the national championship in a year where we had the fewest sacrifices in the Augie era and in a year where we had the second most sacrifices in the Augie era.

    What are we supposed to take from that information?

  8. Scipio Tex said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 10:40 am

    I don’t know, Huck! Spell it out for us!

    Statistics confusing! Science confusing.

    Bunting good. Advance runners! Art of managing! Three run homer inelegant!

  9. BatesHorn said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 10:53 am

    Huck- Do the little things. Bring your experience and clubhouse prescence to the statistical table. Your a veteran at these things, and you have alot to impart to the young stat guys. They are really soaking it up.

    Most importantly: You’re clutch.

  10. Scipio Tex said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 10:58 am

    I credit his chemistry for much of his clutchitude.

    Chemistry inspired by liberal applications of Axe Body Spray.

  11. Jeff Ontiveros said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 11:38 am

    What is bunting?

  12. Truck's Son said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 12:06 pm

    “What are we supposed to take from that information?”

    Whatever you want. I posted because I was surprised to find that we had so few sac bunts in 2002. Probably b/c that team hit the crap out of the baseball. Majewski hit over .400 and there were guys like Moss, Quintanilla, Reininger, Fahey, Ontiveros, Hubele… That team also hit 68 HRs and outscored opponents 511 to 239.

    Combined with one of the best pitching staffs Augie has had, maybe we just got up early in most games and never looked back.

  13. Texantt said:

    March 16th, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    Seriously, this was interesting because I thought Augie bunted more as well. Basically, he’s doing this in situations to minimize a double play and take the bat out of a crappy batter’s hands. It’s still a “Gut” call for him, though.

  14. Chang said:

    March 17th, 2009 at 4:49 am

    I still wonder about the psychological variables. I’ve heard Augie say several times how he has his kids bunt simply because it gives them a high chance to be successful in a way that breeds “team,” creating a culture where a bunch of little victories lead to winning games.

    Might be true.

  15. Chang said:

    March 17th, 2009 at 4:58 am

    Also wonder if it allows you to plug in kids with better gloves into the lineup, knowing that you’ll be relying on them to bunt once a game rather than swinging away each time.

  16. Scipio Tex said:

    March 17th, 2009 at 7:39 am

    Chang:

    Bunting certainly does allow you to plug better gloves into the lineup. However, most baseball analysis will tell you that defense is first and foremost about pitching and that an individual’s defense – though very helpful – should always be weighed substantially less than a player’s primary potential contribution: the ability to score runs.

  17. Derek Jeter said:

    March 17th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    Have you seen my jumpthrow from the hole? It’s sweet!!!

  18. Texantt said:

    March 21st, 2009 at 7:15 am

    OK, we are two series into the Big 12 and have NO comments on how our Horns are starting to crack? Brandon Belt just gave away the game on Friday in Lawrence. I MUST VENT!!!

    go horns

Leave a Reply

Follow Us

Related Articles

Hot Forum Topics

Activity

  • GoHornsGo90 commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   4 hours, 14 minutes ago

    Barnes’ three “strengths”:

    Defense, rebounding, recruiting.

    This team just proved the first two are non-existent (out-rebounded by 25; fucking KIDDING me?) and the last one is over-hyped as well. Every ESPN basketball recruiting analyst who actually had Bradley ahead of Wall should be taken out back and executed Inglourious Basterds style.

    I hate Turgeon and I

  • skymonkeyhorn commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   4 hours, 59 minutes ago

    a Good System will usually beat a talented team that does not play together and are thinking instead of playing basketball ,over a season the system wins more then they will give away.
    A team that is scared to make a mistake and thinks before they react is going to lose to a confident but

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 32 minutes ago

    Nordberg,

    Ironic indeed……teachable moment, I guess….

    NY Horn,

    I hope your drunk, because Izzo ain’t coming to Texas……Why don’t we just get Coach K. I mean Coach G came from Duke, they have to be dying to get out of Durham….

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 36 minutes ago

    Egg, that’s fine, but at what point do you blame Barnes? Seriously, man. You’ve thrown players under the bus left and right, but at a certain point, doesn’t the buck stop somewhere. I know you’re more of an NBA guy so it begins and ends with players there, but we need fucking

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 36 minutes ago

    Egg, that’s fine, but at what point do you blame Barnes? Seriously, man. You’ve thrown players under the bus left and right, but at a certain point, doesn’t the buck stop somewhere. I know you’re more of an NBA guy so it begins and ends with players there, but we need fucking

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 38 minutes ago

    Trips,

    I hear ya. I’m frustrated as well. I guess I just don’t prescribe to such a black and white characterization of the situation. I do know that no matter what happened in the huddle, JCB made a dumb play. If Rick didn’t explain or remind him of the situation, then I

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 46 minutes ago

    Pat, know I don’t, but I’ve had coaches draw up plays to free up the best foul shooter and then tell that guy they’d put their foot up his ass if they passed the ball. It’s funny, but as a fans of football we nitpick blitz pickup and shit like that. Shit that’s

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 46 minutes ago

    Pat, you know I don’t, but I’ve had coaches draw up plays to free up the best foul shooter and then tell that guy they’d put their foot up his ass if they passed the ball. It’s funny, but as a fans of football we nitpick blitz pickup and shit like that. Shit

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 46 minutes ago

    Pat, you know I don’t, but I’ve had coaches draw up plays to free up the best foul shooter and then tell that guy they’d put their foot up his ass if they passed the ball. It’s funny, but as fans of football we nitpick blitz pickup and shit like that. Shit that’s

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 48 minutes ago

    Shitty season…..Rick needs to hire some offensive help and someone needs to say it to him. Deloss?

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 51 minutes ago

    Trips,

    Do you know that he didn’t? JCB has made bad decision all season, why would this be any different. Barnes coached a shitastic game, but on the teams I was the best FT shooter, I never game up the ball unless it was an uncontested layup…..It’s not hard and it doesn’t take a

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 51 minutes ago

    mcpayne, yes, you don’t leave that shit to chance. You don’t let your guys break the huddle or dead ball not knowing precisely what’s expected from them. Barnes doesn’t get 2 mil for coaching PE where he’s hoping the right guy gets fouled.

  • uthookem commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 52 minutes ago

    mpayne, I’d agree with you if J’Covan had been playing all season and had been in situations to make that decision. Like, you know, against Baylor, when he played all of 3 fucking minutes thanks to rick.

    So yes, it is rick’s fault.

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 53 minutes ago

    With 15 seconds left, out of a dead ball, most coaches would make it perfectly clear who they wanted to be fouled.

  • uthookem commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 56 minutes ago

    Stupid decisions by Brown are one of the reasons he sat on the bench for most of the season…lack of coaching maybe, or just a lack of basketball IQ?

    Oh well, if Brown doesn’t go off in the 2nd half, we aren’t even playing in OT. Too bad he didn’t get much of a chance

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 56 minutes ago

    Pat, if you were making 2 million a year, would you leave that up to chance?

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 57 minutes ago

    Actually, if your a PG and the best FT shooter on the team and played basketball your entire life, you’d pretty much know not to give up the ball if you had any brains…..Such a dumb play…..

  • D W commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 58 minutes ago

    Oh, and a stupid decision by Brown in giving up the ball to Johnson.

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 58 minutes ago

    Be nice if we’d coached our 90 percent foul shooter not to give the ball up.

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 58 minutes ago

    Ransom,

    1 for 2, that was not shitty defense……

  • Mister Mike commented on the blog post State of the Union – NU Basketball, Part 1 (or Why We Are Where We Are)   6 hours, 59 minutes ago

    Well if you had read it all the way, you would’ve noticed this little tidbit:

    In the second part I’ll do my best to give an outline of what exactly is wrong with the program, what we can do to fix it, and then what will probably happen TO fix it.

    So to answer your question:

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • uthookem commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 59 minutes ago

    The line kills us, as it should have.

    Fuck Rick Barnes, as this was the worst coaching I have seen in all my years of watching UT sports.

    This saved us from Kentucky, but I feel bad for Damo, he was a hell of a Longhorn.

    Hook ‘em!

    And FUCK RICK BARNES!

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 59 minutes ago

    Feel bad for Damion…..Dexter and Mason, not so much….

  • D W commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   6 hours, 59 minutes ago

    So the season ends with missed free throws and shitty defense by Bradley. Pretty fitting.

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   7 hours ago

    Yup……We knew that FTs would get us….

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   7 hours, 1 minute ago

    F’n Gary’s been awful tonight….

  • uthookem commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   7 hours, 1 minute ago

    GJ at the line…big heart needed!

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   7 hours, 1 minute ago

    Why does Brown give it up there?

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   7 hours, 1 minute ago

    Bilas explaining why we’re not a smart team…Oh good, I want Gary at the line…

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Wake Forest Open thread   7 hours, 2 minutes ago

    The good news is that now I know to fill out the census, so i’m not going to jail…not for that anyway.