Connect with your Facebook Account

Contact

4

The 2008 Team’s Place in Texas History

Posted by Huckleberry on January 12th, 2009 under Football

As disappointing as this season’s outcome was when you consider the whys regarding our not appearing in the Big 12 Championship Game, which therefore cost us an appearance in the National Championship Game, Longhorn fans will always look back on this year’s squad as an overachieving group. And overachieving groups are always remembered more fondly than equally strong teams that underachieved relative to their perceived talent and preseason expectations.

But regardless of preseason expectations, 2008 Texas was a truly great football team. I’ve discussed the limitations of my ratings before, but a real quick refresher before diving into them again.

  1. Blowouts are probably given too much weight. This is one that I wasn’t too sure of before this season, but the 2008 results further convinced me this is the case. I am looking into tweaks that can be made to the system, but the system already utilized diminishing returns for large margins. Some work remains to be done.
  2. A team’s historical strength is affected by their schedule. I have a hard time seeing a way to limit the effect of this factor, as it is at least partially a good thing.
  3. When comparing across seasons, small differences in two squads’ ratings aren’t definitive. We can’t have confidence that a team rated 90.50 was better than a team rated 90.40, that isn’t possible. The ratings are simply best guesses and should be viewed that way. Certainly we can be fairly sure that a team rated 97.50 is better than that 90.40 team.
All-Time Texas Football Teams
Rank Year Rating NSch TxRk
1 2005 100.39 76.03 45
2 2008 95.75 81.82 19
3 1977 95.32 76.06 44
4 1947 94.46 81.89 17
5 1961 94.24 77.45 36
6 1963 93.60 79.56 29
7 1972 92.81 86.72 3
8 1970 92.78 82.18 15
9 1975 91.74 81.82 18
10 1969 90.99 73.32 60

I included the normalized schedule rating as well as the schedule’s rank for all Texas teams on the right side of the table. The blowout situation causes 1977 to be higher than we would otherwise consider them, something that also keeps the 2008 team’s rating a little lower than it could be. But the bottom line is that this year’s team, one that most expected to lose 3 games when it was all said and done, is rated as the second best team in Texas history. Other than the 2005 squad, the rest of the Top 10 is fairly tightly packed, of course, but this was undoubtedly a fantastic football team. In the interest of full disclosure, this year’s team is rated behind Oklahoma, but like I said, blowout wins have a bigger impact on the ratings than I would like. As noted above, 1977 Texas shouldn’t be as high as it is in this list in my opinion.

What about the individual units? As previously discussed in the comments on Scipio’s Ohio State offense preview, the offense and defense numbers below can be affected by differences in the pace at which different teams played. A team that plays more quickly will have an accordingly higher offense and lower defense number. The power number, though, should be pace-neutral as the effects cancel each other out. Also, a strong defense helps the offense and vice versa, so keep that in mind.

All-Time Texas Football Offenses
Rank Year Rating YrRk
1 2005 108.58 1
2 1941 106.57 1
3 1970 101.72 1
4 1975 99.45 1
5 1977 95.03 4
6 1969 94.21 3
7 1947 93.79 3
8 2008 93.57 4
9 1914 93.22 4
10 1968 93.00 2

Not many surprises here, as we’ve got the great 2005 team, the powerful 1941 team, the first three years of the wishbone, and a hanful of other good offenses from Texas history.

All-Time Texas Football Defenses
Rank Year Rating YrRk
1 1978 96.07 2
2 1979 95.53 2
3 1972 92.64 4
4 1963 90.95 2
5 2008 90.48 4
6 1983 89.13 3
7 1929 89.07 1
8 1961 88.89 6
9 2005 88.69 6
10 1977 88.11 9

Not very many surprises here, either, although the loft #5 ranking for this year’s defense will raise some eyebrows. The last table it the total power number, indicating the strongest teams in Texas history in terms of predicting future matchups.

All-Time Texas Football Power Ratings
Rank Year Rating YrRk
1 2005 103.06 1
2 1941 98.39 1
3 2008 96.12 4
4 1970 96.08 1
5 1977 93.61 1
6 1975 93.08 5
7 1961 92.60 3
8 1969 92.14 2
9 1947 91.87 3
10 1972 90.67 5

So 1977, 2005, and 2008 are the only three squads that appear in both the Offense and Defense Top 10s, indicating that they were the three strongest balanced squads in school history according to this model. Obviously the 2005 team is the clear leader.

More from this Barker


Share This

  • StumbleUpon

4 Responses

  1. TaylorTRoom said:

    January 12th, 2009 at 7:34 am

    “In the interest of full disclosure, this year’s team is rated behind Oklahoma, but like I said, blowout wins have a bigger impact on the ratings than I would like.”

    In fairness, Sagarin has 2008 OU rated slightly ahead of 2008 Texas as well. Yet…there is 45 – 35. Facts are stubborn things.

  2. In fairness, Sagarin has 2008 OU rated slightly ahead of 2008 Texas as well. Yet…there is 45 – 35. Facts are stubborn things.

    Sagarin publishes two rankings. The ELO-Chess is tailored for inclusion in the BCS and thus does not account for margin of victory/defeat. On this ranking, Texas is #3 and OU is #4. Sagarin’s Predictor rankings factor in margin of victory, and the rankings of Texas and OU are flipped (#4 and #3, respectively).

    Basically, just like the pea-brained poll voters, Sagarin’s Predictor was fooled by OU’s spree of meaningless 4th-quarter scoring. A better ranking would look at overall dominance in a game, and discount late-game scoring once the outcome was already decided (i.e. points scored by a losing team’s starters against the winning team’s back-ups and points scored by a shithead-coached winning team’s starters against the losing team’s third-string defense).

  3. Bob in Houston said:

    January 12th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    This certainly is not unreasonable. I have a sports betting tome that purports to greatly reduce the effect of fourth-quarter scoring in games in which the winning team is ahead by 21 or more after three.

    I never actually cared to run the numbers and see if the system worked.

  4. Bob in Houston said:

    January 12th, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    This certainly is not unreasonable. I have a sports betting tome that purports to greatly reduce the effect of fourth-quarter scoring in games in which the winning team is ahead by 21 or more after three.

    I never actually cared to run the numbers and see if the system worked.

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Activity

  • Raoul Duke commented on the blog post Want to plant my feet on Rampart Street…   38 minutes ago

    I am so irritated you guys are so good yet I am rooting for you. Saw the BC/MTM guy predicted you to final four.

    That would be awesome.

    Sic em and shit.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • whiskey commented on the blog post Jack Swarbrick Causes Server Meltdown   49 minutes ago

    Nate, I think your argument is pretty solid for the SEC, Big 12 and Pac 10 but not so much on the Big 10. If you look at the 2009 Sagarin strength of sked: ND-37, Ohio St-50, Iowa-41, Penn St-73. Not so sure joining the Big 10 really helps ND’s chances. With

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Raoul Duke commented on the blog post All Signs Point to March Madness Expanding to 96 Teams   53 minutes ago

    The NCAA, apparently, could fuck up a soup sandwich. Piss on Myles Brand’s greedy grave.

  • Raoul Duke commented on the blog post Bush Paves the Way for Henderson?   58 minutes ago

    Mr. Bateman – First let me say I’m not trying to be an asshole or pick a fight. This is a great column and great fun to read.

    Re this:

    I think Kiffin’s staff is competent enough, particularly Papa Kiffin (DC), John Baxter (a pretty good ST coach), and Todd McNair is a decent RB

  • bigdukesix commented on the blog post Bush Paves the Way for Henderson?   1 hour, 45 minutes ago

    Kiffin’s father is a great coach, but the rest of that staff isn’t. Orgeron and Kiffin are both good, dirty recruiters and mediocre to poor gameday coaches.

    How important is that in college football? How good of a gameday coach is Mack Brown? Greg Davis?

    Orgeron is actually a damn fine defensive line coach,

  • Tim commented on the blog post NIT Preview – Seton Hall   1 hour, 50 minutes ago

    How much longer to football season?

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Patrick Bateman commented on the blog post Bush Paves the Way for Henderson?   2 hours, 11 minutes ago

    CTJ,

    Always impassioned. I agree with you that his delay had to do with not being eligible to sign rather than awaiting for the smoke to settle. However, the point is not with motive but with opportunity. Maybe the kid and his family don’t know anything and just trudged along with his planned

  • CloseToJumping commented on the blog post Beat the Barkers NCAA Tourney Bracket   3 hours, 3 minutes ago

    I am angling for the weekend with SizzleChest. I am hoping to channel his evil in the right directions.

  • Casey Heathcott commented on the blog post Want to plant my feet on Rampart Street…   3 hours, 11 minutes ago

    Interesting read by a Kentucky writer: Apparently Kansas and Baylor are the only two teams with a shot at winning it all. http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20100316/COLUMNISTS01/303160023

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Mister Mike commented on the blog post State of the Union – NU Basketball, Part 1 (or Why We Are Where We Are)   3 hours, 30 minutes ago

    I get what you’re saying, but honestly, it’s a cop out. Period. If the AD was to actually commit some resources into building a program, we would be competitive and probably would even give K-State a run for its money. We may never be a KU, but we sure as hell wouldn’t

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • J Rog commented on the blog post Bienvenidos a Miami: Heat Preview   4 hours, 18 minutes ago

    Totally agree re: RJ. I’m hesitant to shout it from the mountain tops until he does it against a contending team. So far his success has been against 2nd tier teams.

    Ginobili is just incredible to watch right now. Just goes to show how hurt he really must have been last season.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Sancho wrote a new blog post: 2010 Football Schedule Released   4 hours, 22 minutes ago

    09/05/10 at Texas Tech

    09/11/10 vs. UAB * Ford Stadium

    09/18/10 vs. Washington State Ford Stadium

    09/24/10 vs. TCU Ford Stadium

    10/02/10 at Rice * Houston, Texas

    10/09/10 vs. Tulsa * Ford Stadium

    10/16/10 at Navy Annapolis, Md.

    10/23/10 vs. Houston * Ford Stadium

    10/30/10 at Tulane * New Orleans, La.

    11/06/10 at UTEP * El Paso, Texas

    11/20/10 vs. Marshall * Ford Stadium

    11/27/10

  • James commented on the blog post Things To Do While Not Watching OU in the NCAA Tourney   4 hours, 37 minutes ago

    Nate, agreed on the buying players. What does the NCAA do? Oh yeah, you “vacate wins”. I vacated my bowels this morning.

    I was busting your balls on Oklahoma. I have had some good times in some of the surprisingly scenic areas. Also, Maker’s is my poison and who would ever

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Burnt Orange Wookiee commented on the blog post Bienvenidos a Miami: Heat Preview   4 hours, 40 minutes ago

    The emergence of RJ being what we thought he would be seems pretty big. Oh, and that Ginobili guy is playing pretty good right now. Seeing Manu be Manu always brings a smile to my face.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Blake Stansbery wrote a new blog post: Arkansas Razorback Football’s Top Six Impact Freshman for 2010   5 hours, 7 minutes ago

    The Arkansas Razorbacks’ 2010 signing class did a good job of filling areas of need and adding size, speed, and talent to Bobby Petrino’s roster.

    The major recruiting services did not rank the Hogs among the top 25 recruiting classes, while the Max Emfinger and Tom Lemmings of the recruiting world did think more highly

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Ibas water bottle commented on the blog post All Signs Point to March Madness Expanding to 96 Teams   5 hours, 9 minutes ago

    Somewhere in rehab Sean Sutton is pissed this didn’t happen 4 years ago.

  • Kevin Berger wrote a new blog post: Bracket Analysis: The Beasts of the East   5 hours, 27 minutes ago

    If the South is a region of guards, the East is a region of men. Large men, that play an old school, physical brand of basketball. Guys like Demarcus Cousins, Kevin Jones, Damion James, Trevor Booker, and Al-Farouq Aminu, put the power in power forward.

    These guys rebound above the rim and

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • J Rog wrote a new blog post: Reggie Miller is a Bad Man   5 hours, 47 minutes ago

     

    If you haven’t yet, I highly recommend watching ESPN’s latest 30 for 30: Winning Time about the Indiana Pacer’sReggie Miller’s rivalry with the New York Knicks in the early 90’s.  Anyone that can make Spike Lee look stupid is a friend of mine.

    The things that Reggie did to John Starks in those playoff series are

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Nordberg commented on the blog post Texas finishes sweep of Iowa   6 hours, 5 minutes ago

    Green and then Workman I’d imagine.

  • J Rog wrote a new blog post: Bienvenidos a Miami: Heat Preview   6 hours, 12 minutes ago

    If we can score, we have a chance.  The Heat are a poor team in a mediocre conference this year and don’t come with a lot of fire power.  The one thing they can do is play defense, holding teams to 95.2 points per game, 5th best in the NBA.  Dorrell Wright returns from a

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Nate Heupel commented on the blog post Things To Do While Not Watching OU in the NCAA Tourney   6 hours, 19 minutes ago

    coloradoag:

    First of all, I’ve very seriously thought your proposal #9 over. See: Calipari, John. People don’t seem to care if you buy basketball players. Only if you do it blatantly (USC) or you call/text them too much.

    Oklahoma (outside of Oklahoma City and Tulsa metropolitan areas) is a lot of fun if you’re

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Sailor Ripley commented on the blog post Bracket Analysis: The South is a Bear of a Bracket   6 hours, 20 minutes ago

    Ha ha ha ha! It’s Joel Osteen’s world. You just live in it.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • admin commented on the blog post Bracket Analysis: The South is a Bear of a Bracket   6 hours, 20 minutes ago

    Ha ha ha ha! It’s Joel Osteen’s world. You just livesin in it.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • admin commented on the blog post Bracket Analysis: The South is a Bear of a Bracket   6 hours, 20 minutes ago

    Ha ha ha ha! It’s Joel Osteen’s world. You just live sin in it.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • ghostofagroundgame commented on the blog post Beat the Barkers NCAA Tourney Bracket   6 hours, 28 minutes ago

    I will own that tote bag. And it will hold my porn.

  • James commented on the blog post Bracket Analysis: The South is a Bear of a Bracket   6 hours, 43 minutes ago

    Baylor has the horses to make it to Indy, but Scott Drew is the Mike Gundy of college hoops. He’ll find a way to blow it.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • HenryJames commented on the blog post Robinson can, no?   7 hours, 18 minutes ago

    Yes, it sounds like he is planning on hitting Texeira third.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Kevin Berger commented on the blog post Bracket Analysis: The South is a Bear of a Bracket   7 hours, 30 minutes ago

    “And I can understand the Longhorn fan thinking mighty Baylor goes all the way. After they bitch slapped the Horns three times this year, they are the basketball equivilent of the three foot long rat my wife saw in the garage.”

    I actually like Baylor based on how they played Kansas and to an extent KSU.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Ag_in_TX commented on the blog post Bracket Analysis: The South is a Bear of a Bracket   7 hours, 37 minutes ago

    Of course not.

    Here is another bold claim – all 7 Big XII teams bolt out the gate and win their first round games.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Kevin Berger commented on the blog post Bracket Analysis: The Wild West Regional   7 hours, 43 minutes ago

    Work, I love Xavier. Really athletic team that feeds off of mismatches that superstar guard Jordan Crawford creates. Hell, he’s good enough to carry X past Minnesota and even Pitt if he’s hot.

    The problem for XU is that they don’t defend as well as they have in the past. They’ll have

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });