<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How We Win: Offense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/</link>
	<description>Texas Longhorns and sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:45:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fritz</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22243</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22243</guid>
		<description>Violent, heated agreement.  Great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Violent, heated agreement.  Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kafka</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22212</link>
		<dc:creator>Kafka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22212</guid>
		<description>Hippie Killer:

IIRC, I got the 235 pounds from some comments that I read during pre-season (I&#039;ll see if I can find them).  I just looked his weight up on the web and the NFL pro prospect sites all list it at 225 pounds.  That is still about 8 pounds bigger than Ogbonnaya (who Mack has said will play some H back).

I&#039;m actually a long time fan (I attended UT in the 70s).  My guess is that pucker originates more with Mack (since Mack looks so tight on the sidelines) than GD but who knows for sure.  Last time I saw GD in the press box, he looked pretty relaxed, even a bit sleepy.

If Greg&#039;s 3 months of brain storming produced anything useful, there is a good probability they will use it against OU.  We would much prefer to beat OU than Mizzou (if forced to choose) so there is no point in holding onto that strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hippie Killer:</p>
<p>IIRC, I got the 235 pounds from some comments that I read during pre-season (I&#8217;ll see if I can find them).  I just looked his weight up on the web and the NFL pro prospect sites all list it at 225 pounds.  That is still about 8 pounds bigger than Ogbonnaya (who Mack has said will play some H back).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually a long time fan (I attended UT in the 70s).  My guess is that pucker originates more with Mack (since Mack looks so tight on the sidelines) than GD but who knows for sure.  Last time I saw GD in the press box, he looked pretty relaxed, even a bit sleepy.</p>
<p>If Greg&#8217;s 3 months of brain storming produced anything useful, there is a good probability they will use it against OU.  We would much prefer to beat OU than Mizzou (if forced to choose) so there is no point in holding onto that strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kafka</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22211</link>
		<dc:creator>Kafka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22211</guid>
		<description>Nate:
You are asking a lot of an OT to keep up with a speedy DE (and Melton is a very fast DE who runs a 4.6 40).  The DE has all the advantages: he is much faster and can use his hands to propel himself by the OT.  

The OT may be able to block the DE if he gets to him but the OT is much slower and can&#039;t always get to the DE.  Depending on the OT to bat 1.000 against top flight DEs is not prudent, especially when your QB&#039;s health depends on it.

OU has enough weapons that they don&#039;t need to take unnecessary risks on O.  A chip block permits the OT to fairly engage the DE and does not stop the TE from getting out on a pass pattern (just slows him down).  It is a small price to pay to neutralize the opposition DEs.

Sam Acho is also really good at rushing the passer at DE.  Sergio Kindle also plays DE quite often and is going to be a handful for any OT.

BTW, Mack Brown said that OU runs the no huddle faster than UT does (which is kind of amazing since UT has been doing it for years) so good on you.  It just shows you that you don&#039;t have to be an innovator or even an early adopter of technology to succeed in football, you just have to execute that technology well when you do adopt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate:<br />
You are asking a lot of an OT to keep up with a speedy DE (and Melton is a very fast DE who runs a 4.6 40).  The DE has all the advantages: he is much faster and can use his hands to propel himself by the OT.  </p>
<p>The OT may be able to block the DE if he gets to him but the OT is much slower and can&#8217;t always get to the DE.  Depending on the OT to bat 1.000 against top flight DEs is not prudent, especially when your QB&#8217;s health depends on it.</p>
<p>OU has enough weapons that they don&#8217;t need to take unnecessary risks on O.  A chip block permits the OT to fairly engage the DE and does not stop the TE from getting out on a pass pattern (just slows him down).  It is a small price to pay to neutralize the opposition DEs.</p>
<p>Sam Acho is also really good at rushing the passer at DE.  Sergio Kindle also plays DE quite often and is going to be a handful for any OT.</p>
<p>BTW, Mack Brown said that OU runs the no huddle faster than UT does (which is kind of amazing since UT has been doing it for years) so good on you.  It just shows you that you don&#8217;t have to be an innovator or even an early adopter of technology to succeed in football, you just have to execute that technology well when you do adopt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22207</link>
		<dc:creator>p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22207</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m kinda with you Scip, however, any mistakes (especially mistakes that are taken up to the hizzouse for 6) by Colt will make the mountain damn near unscalable for your boys.&quot;

This goes for both guys!!

The difference to me is that Bradford rarely gets tested, but when he has it&#039;s been bad. In both the CU and WVU games last year he couldn&#039;t seem to get his head on straight once he got rattled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m kinda with you Scip, however, any mistakes (especially mistakes that are taken up to the hizzouse for 6) by Colt will make the mountain damn near unscalable for your boys.&#8221;</p>
<p>This goes for both guys!!</p>
<p>The difference to me is that Bradford rarely gets tested, but when he has it&#8217;s been bad. In both the CU and WVU games last year he couldn&#8217;t seem to get his head on straight once he got rattled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22181</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22181</guid>
		<description>Sam seems to look better at DE on some occasions and seems to have better technique, but Melton is more physical and is the better athlete, and that has to count for something, especially against an extremely physical OU O-line.  If Sam can bulk up a bit more without losing what he has already, then he could be something to watch in the future, but probably not now.  He shows alot of promise, but I am guessing that, right now, he would be overmatched physically if he was put out there as an every down DE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam seems to look better at DE on some occasions and seems to have better technique, but Melton is more physical and is the better athlete, and that has to count for something, especially against an extremely physical OU O-line.  If Sam can bulk up a bit more without losing what he has already, then he could be something to watch in the future, but probably not now.  He shows alot of promise, but I am guessing that, right now, he would be overmatched physically if he was put out there as an every down DE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godot</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22179</link>
		<dc:creator>Godot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22179</guid>
		<description>&quot;Last year Finley exploited OU’s weaknesses.....&quot;

That was true in the first half only.  We stopped throwing to Fin in the second half, and for most of the rest of the season.  For some reason.

Very unfortunate about Irby.  Hope he has a full recovery.  Ian Harris seems to have the most promise as a pass-catching TE now, but he&#039;s hurt plus they have not seemed determined to work him in.

I also second the &quot;new wrinkles&quot; theory.  GD brought out some new stuff last year, and was more aggressive.  While we only seem to throw to two WRs this season, our OL pass blocking is much better.  And Colt is playing better than he ever has, is healthy and stronger.

I like our chances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Last year Finley exploited OU’s weaknesses&#8230;..&#8221;</p>
<p>That was true in the first half only.  We stopped throwing to Fin in the second half, and for most of the rest of the season.  For some reason.</p>
<p>Very unfortunate about Irby.  Hope he has a full recovery.  Ian Harris seems to have the most promise as a pass-catching TE now, but he&#8217;s hurt plus they have not seemed determined to work him in.</p>
<p>I also second the &#8220;new wrinkles&#8221; theory.  GD brought out some new stuff last year, and was more aggressive.  While we only seem to throw to two WRs this season, our OL pass blocking is much better.  And Colt is playing better than he ever has, is healthy and stronger.</p>
<p>I like our chances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasherized</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22173</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasherized</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22173</guid>
		<description>Nate, Sam Acho deserves that attention. He should be starting over Melton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, Sam Acho deserves that attention. He should be starting over Melton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke Robinson</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22172</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22172</guid>
		<description>I crap bigger&#039;n Texas DEs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I crap bigger&#8217;n Texas DEs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Loadholt</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22171</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Loadholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22171</guid>
		<description>Henry who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NateHeupel</title>
		<link>http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/2008/10/07/how-we-win-offense/comment-page-2/#comment-22168</link>
		<dc:creator>NateHeupel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barkingcarnival.fantake.com/scipio-tex/how-we-win-offense#comment-22168</guid>
		<description>OU&#039;s front 7, even with Granger out, is damn near as good as UT&#039;s.  Both have faced equally strong schedules (equally weak may be a better description), and have comparable stats in every defensive category except pass defense.  UT leads in sacks, OU is 3rd.  OU is 3rd in tackles for loss, UT is 17th.  UT is 4th in scoring D, OU is 15th.  And so forth and so on.

Kafka, while I expect to see OU keep Brody Eldridge in against Orakpo in obvious passing situations, neither Henry Melton nor any other UT DE impresses me as a guy who requires extra attention in the form of a chip block.  Trent Williams will win that battle 10 times out of 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OU&#8217;s front 7, even with Granger out, is damn near as good as UT&#8217;s.  Both have faced equally strong schedules (equally weak may be a better description), and have comparable stats in every defensive category except pass defense.  UT leads in sacks, OU is 3rd.  OU is 3rd in tackles for loss, UT is 17th.  UT is 4th in scoring D, OU is 15th.  And so forth and so on.</p>
<p>Kafka, while I expect to see OU keep Brody Eldridge in against Orakpo in obvious passing situations, neither Henry Melton nor any other UT DE impresses me as a guy who requires extra attention in the form of a chip block.  Trent Williams will win that battle 10 times out of 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
