Connect with your Facebook Account

• Contact

Football Articles

56

Texas/Colorado Football Analysis

Posted by Scipio Tex on September 29th, 2008 under Football

I’ve decided to distract myself from gawking at the smoldering ruin that was my 401K by researching a bit about the Buffaloes. Before the year, I would have been pleased to leave Boulder with a last second field goal for the win. The game set up well for them for a host of reasons. Right now I can’t say I’m overly concerned about the Buffs. Partly that’s us, a lot of that is them. Still, this is the team last year that beat OU…and lost to Iowa State. That’s a high beta. I respect that sort of willful inconsistency.

They’re 3-1 right now, but that W/L ratio won’t hold. Their OL will though. All three of them.

Season to Date:

Colorado St 38-17 W
Eastern Washington 31-24 W
West Virginia 17-14 W
Florida State 21-39 L

West Virginia and Florida State are obviously not what their name brand suggests. Their struggle with Eastern Washington is puzzling – Colorado trailed 21-7 at halftime and needed 14 points and a last second interception return for a touchdown to win. They defecated their pants in Florida and allowed a Florida State team QBed by a finite number of monkeys to dominate them with defense, a running game, and special teams. The same FSU team Wake held to a field goal. Colorado fans blame their sluggish play on flatlands humidity and their inability to rally after the devastating news about Lehman Brothers.

Here are their stats and rankings.

This is a very mediocre Buffalo team that will be fortunate to go 4-4 in the Big 12 Norte.

Offense:

Starting OT Ryan Miller – arguably their most dynamic OL – is the latest loss. He fractured his fibula against FSU. His replacement is a RS Frosh named Matt Bahr and he’ll line up next to another RS Frosh at OG. LT Nate Solder is 6′9″ 300. So basically, Dexter Pittman plays LT for Colorado. C Daniel Sanders is a post-season awards candidate and their only senior. They’ve run blocked well this year, but pass protection has been very suspect.

At WR, Colorado has Darrell Scott’s uncle WR Josh Smith. He is his own grandpa. That’s their receiving corps. He’s a speedy guy and a major threat on special teams when he’s not fumbling like a buffoon. TE Riar Greer will factor into their gameplan for reasons I’ll get into later.

Dan Hawkins gave the keys of his offense to son Cody and like any good college kid, Cody has wrapped that motherfucker around a lamp post. Cody is 5-11 190 with a weakish arm. He makes up for it by not being a running threat. Every now and then you seem him throw an amazing ball, but before you’ve finished rubbing your eyes to see if it really happened, he hits a line judge in the buttock with an errant throw and calls out, “Sorrrrrrrrrrryyyyy, Daaaaad!”

The RB grouping has good talent: Rodney Stewart, Darrell Scott, Demetrius Sumler. Little Rodney Stewart is the surprise starter and he’s been extemely productive. He’s small and squirty. Like Cytherea. Don’t Google that on your work computer. He had 273 yards combined against WVU and FSU. Darrell Scott is immensely talented but just can’t get it together — he’s dinged and running without much patience. Sumler is a good power option. Many Longhorns want Darrell Scott in the game so Brian Orakpo can bury his helmet in his throat, but I’m pretty sanguine about it all. The Mack Brown Recruiting Curse will work in time.

Philosophically, Colorado has no real offensive philosophy. Hawkins coaches like water – he fills whatever vessel the defense presents. Unfortunately, their output has been a trickle.

Analysis: They are compromised on the OL, have one receiver, a questionable QB, and fine RBs. Colorado is going to pound the ball between the tackles, half-roll Hawkins for quick throws to TE Riar Greer, screen with their backs, and max protect to take shots down the field with Josh Smith. That’s it. If they have some success pounding the ball, they could prove pesky to our defense as it will force us to commit to stopping the run and leave our youngsters exposed to play action. We’ll see some trick plays because it’s The Hawk and he needs something to get the juices going. If we can inflict any negative plays, it’s over. They might as well punt on 2nd and 14. The name of their game needs to be ball control. Our offense will play such a key role in this. If they fall behind early and have to throw on every down, it should get ugly.

Defense:

The Colorado defense isn’t bad, but they’re not a pressure group. The DL is very solid against the run and George Hypolite is a legit All-Big 12 guy. None of their front four pass rushes particularly well. West Virgina was able to run on them a bit, but they’re West Virginia. What’s disconcerting for CU is that FSU ran on them.

LB is OK and not up to CU standards. They miss Jordan Dizon. Their guys are well coached and very active, but none of them are going to manhandle anyone.

The secondary is very competent. Both CBs can run but they’re smallish: they go 5′7 180 and 5′11 165. We’ll present some problems for them after the catch.

Analysis: They don’t pressure the passer well. We’re a precision passing team. If they blitz extra men, I like Colt’s chances on the run. They should handle our running game and their secondary is competent enough to challenge the Shipley/Cosby/McCoy mind meld. We’re not going to score 52 points, but it would take poor execution for them to keep us below 27.

Special Teams:

Josh Smith will probably run back a kick for a TD and drop a ball on their 5 yard line. So the net/net exchange is zero.

X-Factors

Colorado will be at home in a night game. The fans will be raucous early, but if Colorado starts to lose they’ll start playing hackeysack and listen to Phish on their Ipods.

Altitude. Well, apparently it is determined by your attitude. I learned that in a team-building exercise. So if you arrive in Boulder with an attitude of oxygenation, you won’t be impacted. This is how Tenzing Norgay conquered Everest: with an attitude of oxygenated thoughts.

Colorado OL. This is a problem for them. If Colorado tries to throw the ball on too many obvious passing downs, The Hawk will Mike Martz his own son.

Hawk Kwan Do. Not a problem. Sergio Kindle knows The FootFist Way.

I feel good about the game. It should be fun and we’ll learn some more stuff about the team. What are your thoughts?

Article Tags:

, , , ,

More from this Barker


Share This

  • StumbleUpon

56 Responses

  1. svrep said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 12:55 am

    “they’ll start playing hackeysack and listen to Phish on their Ipods”

    I just woke up my roommate with my laughter.

  2. Parlin Hall said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 2:14 am

    The equalizer for the Buffs has to be the psychedelic properties of their stadium.

    Imagine Johnny Cash’s ‘68 prison concert as performed by Duran Duran to a crowd really twisted about the fascist return policy at William Sonoma, and you’ve got some idea of the disorienting atmosphere that challenges visiting teams.

  3. EyesOfTX said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 4:02 am

    You are the only person living or dead who could work Cytherea into a post about football. I stand in awe.

  4. soliver465 said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 4:02 am

    Excellent analysis, you are clearly Scipio Tex the Elder.

  5. Ransom Stoddard said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 4:03 am

    I play golf in Breckenridge on Friday, again in Denver on Saturday morning, then off to Boulder for some microbrewery, then to the game to see us win about 24-10.

  6. EyesOfTX said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 4:06 am

    As for the game, is it really possible we will win 4 of our first 5 games by identical 52-10 scores? I’m thinking it’ll be close to that.

    If CU’s OL were healthy, this might be more of a contest, but with 3 starters out, our DL is just going to rip poor Cody H. to shreds. I hope his mother doesn’t come to the game.

    CU does nothing on defense that will slow our offense down. Of course, we’ll slow ourselves down with our own rushing scheme, but Colt to Quan and Shipley will more than make up for that.

    Like you, I came into this season very concerned about the CU game. Of course, before the season began, I was also concerned about Arkansas.

    So I got 52-10 in this one. It seems to be a recurring theme.

  7. Nordberg said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 4:46 am

    I’ll take the UTEP score. This game will look similar to that one.

  8. hiphopopotamus said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 4:51 am

    @ Eyes – I’ve been higher on Texas and lower on Colorado than most this season, but do you really think this will be 52-10?

  9. EyesOfTX said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 4:56 am

    hipho – I think it’s going to be a very, very one-sided game. The 52-10 thing was kind of tongue in cheek, but not entirely out of the question, either.

  10. Huckleberry said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 5:09 am

    I’ve got 45-13. Have to preserve the +28-point victory streak as well as the <14 points allowed streak.

  11. Art Vandelay said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 5:33 am

    Close for 1.5 quarters. Horns put it away in 2nd half with two defensive TD’s. 45-17.

    Is Fozzy going to play?

  12. BoomerFreakin' Sooner said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 5:46 am

    Ransom Stoddard
    September 30, 2008 at 4:03 am I play golf in Breckenridge on Friday, again in Denver on Saturday morning, then off to Boulder for some microbrewery, then to the game to see us win about 24-10.

    Is there really any difference playing out of a Longhorm patty lie or a Buffalo patty lie? If not, why go…

  13. hphorn said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 5:47 am

    “QB Dan Hawkins gave the keys of his offense to son Cody and like any good college kid, Cody has wrapped that motherfucker around a lamp post.” Tremendous read with great insight and laughter as always. Thanks Scip.

  14. Uncle Rico said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 5:57 am

    great ness

    texas 38
    muffalo 20

  15. MWS said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 6:04 am

    Coach McCartney to Dan Hawkins : Meditation is great and all, but I’ve never heard it save anybody from a gang rape type situation.

  16. jc25 said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 6:09 am

    Damn you Scip, I just Googled Cytherea in my mind. Now my brain is on screen saver.

  17. Bellmont's Meaningless Streak-Calculating Computer said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 6:29 am

    “I’ve got 45-13. Have to preserve the +28-point victory streak as well as the

  18. Vasherized said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 6:35 am

    The defense continues its progression with some kind sacks and epic turnovers, setting up a short field for Colt McCoy to do some early damage to Captain Kirkendoll with the DEEP BALL.

    We have to use that play before OU so that have some film of dangerous formations that they won’t actually see in Dallas.

    Darrell Scott switches to a UT jersey at halftime.

  19. Mockingbird said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 6:40 am

    I’m less concerned with the score than I am Texas getting some time for Fozzy and the young receivers. GD and Mack can’t take those kids in to the RRS without building some confidence in those guys.

    The Sooner pass defense is a major chink in their armor. Shipley & Quan as the only options hamstrings Colt to force plays.

    If Fozzy & Mal &/or Collins – Kirk – Buckner all have a good game than I’ll feel much better about the RRS.

    For the Arkansas game I grilled some pork ribs and chops. This week I’ll stop washing my hair, make my commute to work on a longboard and use hemp toilet paper.

  20. Huckleberry said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 6:50 am

    So I analyzed the points per possession statistics for both teams. As always, drives that ended due to the end of a half are not included. Also, negative points were awarded to offenses for defensive touchdowns and safeties.

    After analyzing the teams’ numbers, I plugged in a “nationwide average” points per possession based on different starting positions. This is really only based on the Texas and Colorado averages, so this is by far the weakest part of the analysis. Using all of these numbers I then utilized the Log5 method of calculating the expected points per possession based on different starting positions in this weekend’s game. Only three starting ranges had what could possibly be considered a statistically useful amount of data.

    Here is the chart:

    As you can see, no matter how you look at it, this game should be a comfortable win. We can expect to outscore Colorado by about 2.5 points for every possession that starts between the 20 and midfield. Based on the number of such possessions so far that’s a starting advantage of 20 points. And that’s before you get into turnovers and field position, areas that we should win based on our overall better team and which will account for the remaining possessions.

    Basically, Colorado is going to need a lot of big breaks to win this game. If we don’t do anything stupid, we walk.

  21. J.R.69 said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 7:08 am

    I’m just worried that, when Colt/Quan/Shipley explode on them, CU may bring in Cytherea to put out the fire.

  22. BrickHorn said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 7:31 am

    Interesting work, Huck.

  23. Jamdog said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 7:38 am

    Squirty like Cytherea, really. You my friend are an outstanding wordsmith.

  24. TWC said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 7:39 am

    And if we fall behind we can always put in the Major.

  25. MWS said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 7:42 am

    Dan Hawkins : I’M IN FULL GODDAMN CONTROL AND THIS SHIT CAN HAPPEN TO ME.

  26. Mysterious Package said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 7:44 am

    ‘Q package’ may be fading
    By Alan Trubow, John Bridges
    AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
    Tuesday, September 30, 2008

    ‘Q package’ falls out of favor

    Fans aren’t the only ones who are questioning the purpose of the “Q package,” Texas’ two-quarterback formation in which John Chiles joins Colt McCoy in the game.

    Texas coach Mack Brown and offensive coordinator Greg Davis indicated Monday that the formation might have a brief future.

    “The Q package right now hasn’t brought us anything much,” Brown said. “We’ll continue to look at it. … It doesn’t look like it’s going to be as involved as we thought at the beginning of the year.”

    Brown and Davis cited the development of Texas’ young receivers as a reason the “Q” has seen only limited use. Davis said James Kirkendoll, Malcolm Williams and Brandon Collins have stepped up at receiver, making it less critical that Chiles line up there.

    Davis said Chiles continues to need as many snaps as he can get in practice at quarterback, perhaps stunting his development as a receiver.

    “John isn’t far enough along as a quarterback to spend all his time at receiver, learning the nuances of that position,” Davis said.

  27. Texbot5463 said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 8:06 am

    Outstanding reference to Beta.

  28. 8straight said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 9:15 am

    Malcolm, Malcolm.

  29. steven said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 9:16 am

    The only analysis I need to know is that we are better and they are worse and we are going to ass stomp the Buffs in their own house. That’s the only analysis I care to know and it be good enough for me.

  30. colobuff said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 9:30 am

    Buff fan here. First off, your blog is awesome. Best football writing on the web. You’re dead on about our O-line. It was young and inexperienced before all the injuries. Now, well, I’m afraid Cody’s going to get seriously hurt – a la Joel Klatt. UT’s got a lot of beef up front. We’ve got some great young speed, but we’re still a year or two away from being a great team. For now, though, it’s gonna be a beautiful day for football in Boulder on Saturday. Hope that those of you attending have a great time in Boulder (if you don’t, something’s seriously wrong with you). Many of us are still licking our wounds from 70-3, which put the nail in Gary Barnett’s coffin (thank you for that part, at least). Unlike a Gary Barnett team, Hawk’s teams have some guts and a lot of pride. I expect a sound UT win, but stranger things have happened at Folsom – just ask Oklahoma.

  31. Amos Moses said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 10:37 am

    “Cody is 5-11 190 with a weakish arm. He makes up for it by not being a running threat.”

    Thanks, this made my day. Excellent analysis. I expect a relatively slow start that morphs into a thorough thumping and Texas victory.

  32. A Einstein said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 10:55 am

    “The only analysis I need to know is that we are better and they are worse and we are going to ass stomp the Buffs in their own house. That’s the only analysis I care to know and it be good enough for me.”

    Yes but I hear their women are especially slutty with the football players. Stay away young steven!

  33. embolism said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 11:03 am

    Lotta big spreads forecasted above. Of course there is no money behind them. If there was Vegas might open it enough for me to bet.

    Dont look at the FSU game too hard. Their strengths matched up perfectly with our weaknesses. Now I want to hear a barrage of overconfident smack about the Buffs having any strengths.

    Do Texas fans know what an Ipod is? Sumpin tells me there are a few Phish phans in Austin.
    And where is Coach Callahan? He usually doesnt miss a chance to smugly diss CU (even though there aint no rivalry). Maybe he realizes his team aint any better…..NAH!

  34. Greg Davis Rides the Short(pass) Bus said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 11:07 am

    “He is his own grandpa”

    Josh Smith did “The nasty in the pasty”.

    Excellent.

  35. Huckleberry said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am

    Well, you’re right that there’s no money behind my specific prediction of 45-13.

    But money behind Texas -13.5? Certainly.

  36. coach Callahan said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 1:13 pm

    What could I add that the FSU game didn’t say? I will say this though. It sucks that Miller got hurt and I hope the kid heals quickly and completely he’s a good football player.

  37. huge said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 2:46 pm

    Cytherea reference? i’m impressed.

  38. dedfischer said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 2:54 pm

    I just feel more comfortable about myself knowing someone else other than me has watched the entirety of one of her videos.

  39. Flower Tucci said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 4:19 pm

    Cytherea reference? i’m impressed.

    Whatever.

  40. Sasha Grey said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 5:45 pm

    Are you people kidding me?

  41. Sasha_Is_A_Longhorn_Dog said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    I think you picked an unfortunate screen name.

  42. bevoshapedwaffles said:

    September 30th, 2008 at 9:12 pm

    45-3 They won’t do shit.

    Oh freeones.com, how I love thee….

    Hook ‘em

  43. ponderos said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 4:17 am

    Mockingbird
    September 30, 2008 at 6:40 am

    The Sooner pass defense is a major chink in their armor.

    Not if you can’t run the ball.

  44. Kafka said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 6:24 am

    Playing in Boulder is worth about 7 points to the buffs (in spite of the horns’ altitude attitude).

    It is possible for the buffs to construct an O that can grind clock with half an O line that can run block well at the point of attack, good backs, a QB who can throw short accurately, a good TE, and a good WR.

    Because of the buffs’ running attack, the horns will probably stay in a 4-3, instead of a nickel.

    Given that the buffs only have 1 good WR and a bunch of good RBs, they might as well replace a WR with an RB. This will make it much easier to force the horns to pass cover a back with an LB (never a good thing).

    Presumably Scott will draw a double team so he can be used to clear out an area before the buffs throw short to the back into the vacated area. This might facilitate YAC.

    I doubt the horns get that many sacks this weekend because coach Hawkins will attempt to minimize the sacks by mostly running and throwing short passes (he does not want the QB (his boy) getting slaughtered).

    The buffs probably don’t throw long much until after the horns’ safeties over commit to stopping the run game (if that ever happens).

    The buffs having two good DBs means that possibly they can defend Quan and Ship decently and force Colt to throw elsewhere more than usual. If so, it will be interesting to see who Colt throws to and how successful that is.

    Maybe this is the weekend that we see Ogbonnaya at H back. If Collins and Kirkendoll get more snaps at WR, how is Malcolm going to be used? He is a big strong receiver on a team that desperately needs big, strong receivers (i.e. with the loss of Irby and the small stature of Quan, Ship, Kirkendoll, and Collins).

  45. Kafka said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 9:07 am

    I meant Josh Smith (Scott’s uncle) will draw a double team, not Scott.

  46. HenryJames said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 9:10 am

    Is he worth doubling?

  47. Scipio Tex said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 9:21 am

    I just don’t see a good scenario for their offense unless our secondary completely loses their mind in play action.

  48. dedfischer said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 9:48 am

    I caught a replay of the OU/CO game from last year and watched the last quarter and a half. It refreshed my memory a little and reminded me of some things they like to do. Most of their offense is generated out of playaction and Hawkins is most effective on rollouts out of playaction and short passes to the TE, or the deeper option of WR on the backside. He really likes to go to the TE. They’ll run a lot of out routes with the WR and corner routes with the TE. What Dan Hawkins really likes to do is test your LBs. After re-watching that game it reminded me of how bad Ryan Reynolds sucks, and how grossly overrated Curtis Lofton was, although he was playing pretty damn salty towards the end of the year. Hawkins had the OU LBs guessing the whole second half, and he’ll do some subtle things formationally to give his OL great blocking angles. He’ll also you the FB lead a lot. Muckelroy should be okay, but I would be a little concerned about Norton. He’ll be running in circles for most of the game. That being said, they don’t really have anything for longer down and distances. Their offense must stay on track on 1st and 2nd down, or the playbook gets pretty limited. 90% of their passing game is generated through playaction.

  49. dedfischer said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 9:54 am

    Well shit, you covered it all in your write-up. Should have known better.

  50. ChrisApplewhite said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 11:42 am

    Their defense is sloooooowwwwww. They miss Dizon. Now they are seeing what it’s like to go from DJ to Killebrew.

    I bet we can outscore them fairly easily, unless we start fumbling or some shit.

  51. Gene Claude said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 11:54 am

    The MU and UT lines are easy money this weekend…unless we start fumbling or some shit.

  52. Kafka said:

    October 1st, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    HJ:
    Scipio says that Josh Smith is their only good WR (so I assume Josh is good). If the horns are playing man coverage, then it makes sense that they will give safety help on the best WR that CU has (especially if he is the only good WR for CU).

    Scipio:
    CU may have a viable offense if they able to run OK against UT. CU ran for 4.7 yards per rush against West Virginia on 45 rushes and racked up 24 first downs. If CU can run close to that effectively against UT and throws short effectively to backs and TE, they could end up grinding a lot of clock.

    Running effectively (as you mention) would also make play action more dangerous (especially when you are playing freshman safeties).

    UT has also mostly played a nickel against the good passing teams that it has played this season. Against CU, UT will probably have to stay in a 4-3 to deal with CU’s running attack (if CU can run adequately).

    CU will probably mostly stick to the short passing game when it passes. Attacking a 4-3 with a short passing game is easier than attacking a nickel because you can pick on an LB rather than a DB. It also presents the opportunity to use some of those running backs that CU has in such abundance (and get a mediocre CU WR off the field). Short passes are easier to catch than long passes and don’t require much pattern running memory/ability (i.e. it is easier for an RB to participate in the short passing game than for longer passes).

    Defending short passing is distracting to the LBs, thus has a synergistic effect on the run game.

    Lastly, it is nearly impossible to sack the QB on a short pass.

    UT has wonderful run D stats this season but has not really been tested by a good running team thus far so we don’t know for sure how good UT is against the run. I am guessing pretty good but you never know until they play the game.

    Finally, I found it non trivial to respond to your post because it was so complete. Being a devil’s advocate for the buffs is more interesting than simply saying “Another great post, Scipio”.

  53. sooner tim said:

    October 2nd, 2008 at 7:27 am

    Everybody thinks they’ll go into Boulder and roll….until they don’t. It’s a funky place. You’ll win but I be surprised if by more than two TDs.

  54. all hat said:

    October 2nd, 2008 at 7:12 pm

    sheee – yut!
    what in the hay -all are you talking about?
    pass me another one of them Pearls there son.
    aint nuttin but and never been nuttin but ladies on that coloradie football team.

    Iffin we dont win by at least 2 dozen touchdowns and I wont renew my season pass to Wolfcreek

  55. All Day Long said:

    October 3rd, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Good Analysis, except I think the Colorado corners are a little worse than what was said. However playing in Boulder has proven tougher for teams than expected and with the crowd sold out and being a night game Colorado should come out with some good energy. Second half I see the longhorns pulling away but closer than a lot of posters have it. I’d say 35-24.

  56. Longhorns4life said:

    October 3rd, 2008 at 4:42 pm

    This is the type of game the buffs want. you guys came off of a 4 cupcake schedule with all the confidence in the world. you forgot to mention pat williams who hasnt done much due to double coverage. Colorado’s LB’s are top 3 in the conference in my opinion. The runningbacks have a lot of talent limited by a young OL. I think our LB’s will play well but this is our first test. Dont get too confident! I dont want to be another Oklahoma, especially before the RRS!

Leave a Reply

Follow Us

Related Articles

Hot Forum Topics

Activity

  • Ag_in_TX commented on the blog post Post-Mortem: Texas Tech Red Raiders   ago

    How did this post make you not seem like an idiot?

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Thoughts on the win in Austin   ago

    Great write up. I’ll be rooting for you to keep Calipari on the schnide.

    That typed, I envy your program and hate you for it. fuckers

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Blake Stansbery commented on the blog post Recruiting the Trenches   ago

    I like my wine in a box…. I like my wine in a box GIIIRL

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • texasengr commented on the blog post 2011 Texas Football Recruiting   2 minutes ago

    The General,

    I think the WR screen you were looking for could be seen at ~1:55. However, this was an effective play, so we really don’t know how he will take the blow from an unblocked defender 4 yards behind the line of scrimmage.

  • Sailor Ripley commented on the blog post Did Rick Barnes use a plant last night to distract KU players?   4 minutes ago

    We commented on the lass during telecast. Thanks for, getting this up, so to speak.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • skymonkeyhorn commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Kansas: Post-Mortem   11 minutes ago

    EP, careful those word will get you a rebuke from Peter Pan. Those words should not be heard until March if we are disappointed by this talented team. Lets wait until the season is a complete train wreck then lets file a legal brief that is in lawyeris to explain what a fuck up season

  • Mister Mike commented on the blog post Recruiting the Trenches   11 minutes ago

    Sailor’s sponsoring it? Holy shit…that likely means goats, togas, and lots of cheap wine.

    Welcome to the network!

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Kansas: Post-Mortem   15 minutes ago

    Bates, thanks man. That means a lot.

  • skymonkeyhorn commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Kansas: Post-Mortem   40 minutes ago

    Yeah your right, penders teams were at least fun to watch play. Barnes offense is pretty bad not as bad as Tom’s but its all relative to who is watching the worst offense in Texas history.

    “His teams did not play D, did not box out, and were generally unsound in the fundamentals of the game.”
    Close

  • czarcw commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Kansas: Post-Mortem   41 minutes ago

    Our hoops team is the basketball version of Major League.

    Jake Taylor = Damion James
    Pedro Cerrano = Dexter Pittman
    Willie Mays Hays = Avery Bradley
    Roger Dorn = Justin Mason
    Isuro Tanaka (Major League II) = Dogus Balbay
    Rube Baker (Major Leauge II) = Jordan Hamilton

    If Craig Way starts drinking whiskey during the broadcasts, it’ll complete the analogy.

  • Farmer Ted commented on the blog post Recruiting the Trenches   44 minutes ago

    Nice job with this – and welcome to the network, on behalf of Better Off Red. See you at the Fantake retreat in Vegas that Sailor Ripley is sponsoring this summer!

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • J Rog commented on the blog post Game Day: Spurs vs. Lakers Open Thread   48 minutes ago

    Fell apart in the fourth quarter again. Can’t give up 28 points to close out a game. Spurs, Longhorns….heartache once again.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Farmer Ted commented on the blog post Thoughts on the win in Austin   51 minutes ago

    Nice job Hiphop. Very nice to win what is probably the toughest game on the schedule handily, although the Hawks obviously caught UT at a good time.

    The Morningstar FT was terrible and hilarious. He said the ball was wet, which clearly means Texas was cheating somehow. Would the second chance off balance leaner

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Nickel Rover commented on the blog post Another night, another would-be hero   52 minutes ago

    I don’t think McCoy played anywhere near the level of Suh and the numbers make it clear that he did not. Suh had twice as many tackles (77-31), sacks (11-5) and nearly tackles for loss (22-14.5). Suh also broke up 10 passes, if he gets stonewalled on the rush he doesn’t allow it to take

  • skymonkeyhorn commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Kansas: Post-Mortem   53 minutes ago

    We are bound to the past no matter how great the past is, we are bound to fail if we do not look to the future.
    The End

  • J Rog wrote a new blog post: Missed Opportunities: Spurs vs. Lakers Recap   59 minutes ago

    Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot.  This game was served up on a silver platter for the Spurs and they managed to fumble it like a Minnesota Viking in the playoffs. 

    I think perhaps Will Ferrell can describe my emotions on the current state of the Spurs season better than I. 

     

    The Spurs hung around for most of the

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • slugfest commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Kansas: Post-Mortem   1 hour, 1 minute ago

    EP, I get your point, but I don’t think the fact that Texas hasn’t won a tourney came as an underdog doesn’t support it. Teams are favored because they are better. The odds that they win are greater than those who are not favored. It’s not like Texas goes into games with a secret weapon

  • Mister Mike commented on the blog post Did Rick Barnes use a plant last night to distract KU players?   1 hour, 6 minutes ago

    I think KU should demand an immediate investigation. Find someone to get to the bottom of this.

    I volunteer myself.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Top 8 Teams in College Hoops   1 hour, 9 minutes ago

    Georgetown?

  • RRR commented on the blog post Thoughts on the win in Austin   1 hour, 9 minutes ago

    Good write up, hiphop. I love the versatitility of the Morris twins on defense. Xavier Henry is probably the key to a big run in the tournament. If he starts hitting open looks, the inside game will really open up. Post to post passing is fun to watch.

    It’s pretty nice when

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Kansas: Post-Mortem   1 hour, 13 minutes ago

    PB, just talking. I’m not ready to replace him but something has to change. The comment about playing 3 on 5 three quarters into the season is just astoundingly bad.

  • Blake Stansbery commented on the blog post Petrino Building Fence Around Arkansas   1 hour, 22 minutes ago

    Here is more info on Frazier. He is such a great player, and Arkansas needs to land him in a big way.

    http://www.kiehlfrazier15.com/Home.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow1mOrMQXYw

    These Highlights are from his Sophomore year, and he had a bigger and better 2009. OH MY!

  • Blake Stansbery commented on the blog post Petrino Building Fence Around Arkansas   1 hour, 22 minutes ago

    Here is more info on Frazier. He is such a great player, and Arkansas needs to land him in a big way.

    http://www.kiehlfrazier15.com/Home.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow1mOrMQXYw

    These Highlights are from his Sophomore year, and he had a bigger and better 2009. OH MY!

  • Blake Stansbery commented on the blog post Petrino Building Fence Around Arkansas   1 hour, 22 minutes ago

    Here is more info on Frazier. He is such a great player, and Arkansas needs to land him in a big way.

    http://www.kiehlfrazier15.com/Home.html

    These Highlights are from his Sophomore year, and he had a bigger and better 2009. OH MY!

  • Trips Right commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Kansas: Post-Mortem   1 hour, 25 minutes ago

    It takes more time…unless you’re a Kentucky fan.

  • RRR commented on the blog post Mid-Season Thoughts and OU Pre-Game   1 hour, 26 minutes ago

    Thanks Trips. I’m hoping for lots of Willie Warren trying to be Sheron Collins. TMG in sync is the scariest thing to face in Norman. That or we get beat up on the boards which seems to be recurring theme of Texas Tech road games.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • slugfest commented on the blog post Texas Hoops vs. Kansas: Post-Mortem   1 hour, 27 minutes ago

    I don’t think it’s a case of RB not being able to coach, or doing a poor job of coaching. If you read the entirety of Katz’ blog post, he clearly sounds like a coaching searching for answers — answers that come in the form of players contributing, doing what they are coached to do.

  • Blake Stansbery commented on the blog post John Pelphrey’s Unconventional Approach   1 hour, 34 minutes ago

    I agree that an NIT bid would be acceptable this year, but that if the Razorbacks can get to 20 wins they will have a very good chance at the NCAA Tourney.

    Our RPI is bad, and we have no signature wins.

    However, we have 8 games left on the SEC regular season schedule. If we

  • Blake Stansbery commented on the blog post John Pelphrey’s Unconventional Approach   1 hour, 34 minutes ago

    I agree that an NIT bid would be acceptable this year, but that if the Razorbacks can get to 20 wins they will have a very good chance at the NCAA Tourney.

    Our RPI is bad, and we have no signature wins.

    However, we have 8 games left on the SEC regular season schedule. If we

  • Blake Stansbery commented on the blog post Recruiting the Trenches   1 hour, 38 minutes ago

    TP welcome to the network.

    I like how you broke this down, and identified which positions history shows a high star ranking has proven to be important. I personally feel that after what all the recruiting sites dub their top players that there is a major falloff. We all love that the recruiting sites bring

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });