Urban Meyer has single wing packages in his offense. Single wing turned into the T. the T into the wishbone. The bone into the split veer. The veer into the flexbone, etc.

His “running game” is not based on any one of those anymore than the other. It’s all option, baby.

When he has a more complete team, he runs different things. When he has one guy, he sticks him at QB and pretty much runs a modern single wing. However:

“Urban Meyer did a lot of that spread flexbone motion stuff at Utah.”

Please describe, in your best 50’s noir gumshoe dialect, where this statement contradicts anything regarding the presence of any old single wing stuff.

Yes, it is.

“Q. At some points last season, did you run double team blocks at both sides of the point of attack for Tebow? Do you have any single wing in your background anywhere, way back?

COACH MEYER: Single wing? No, I don’t believe I have seen single wing. I studied it as we just developed it when we were at Bowling Green. ”

http://blog.al.com/keepingscore/2008/07/full_transcript_florida_coach.html

If you can’t look at Florida offense, especially their short yardage packages for Tebow, and see the single wing, I don’t know what to tell you.

Regardless, all he did at BGSU and Utah was take the zone read, add a flexbone wing motion to it, and ran the veer. I don’t really care where those elements came from.

One, no it’s not. Two, he didn’t study the shotgun option at Notre Dame, he create his version there and immediately took it to Bowling Green. Three, he used the motion guy for a lot of things, but mostly as the pitch man in a similar fashion to the flexbone.

Four, just to make sure we both look like jackasses here, saying the option came from the flexbone rather than the single wing is like saying humans came from homo erectus rather than apes.

Meyer’s running game is based on the single wing, not the flexbone. He studied the shotgun option game at Notre Dame, and used the motion series from the SW to give him an outside threat on the option.

” He’s done it less at Florida because he hasn’t found a true double threat yet.”

Tebow is more of a power-runner than a finesse guy, so Meyer uses a buck lateral SW series with him as his base running game. Alex Smith was a little more finesse than Tebow.

He does do some fun things by motioning Percy Harvin around.

Made Don McPherson a Heisman runner-up in ‘87.

How about Ronald Veal, the QB at Arizona? They ran a balanced wishbone that you could throw pretty effectively out of – if someone other than Ronald Veal was your QB.

The set up was two WRs with no TE, FB, two HBs. Forced the defense to declare strength based on the hash marks or go balanced themselves. They ran true wishbone reads in the running game paired with a deep passing game to the ends. You could do a lot of deceptive stuff. Very interesting conceptually though they didn’t have the skill position talent you need to make it really effective.

There was a lot of this stuff being tinkered with in the 80’s. It’s funny that it took a bunch of high school coaches to hone the different versions of the spread we see today.

In terms of Spreadology, Urban Meyer is a relative latecomer. He just invented his own little brilliant version and has shown the greatest adaptability to personnel of any coach I’ve seen.

His Utah offense was a beautiful thing to watch.

My son’s high school ran that flexbone (Tim Beck, now RB coach at Nebraska, was the head coach at Summit and a flexbone lover) until Chiles showed up and, to their credit, the coaches said to themselves: “Hmmm, we gotta do somethin’ with that!”