Connect with your Facebook Account

• Contact

Football Articles

9

The History of College Football Recruiting Cheating- Part 10

Posted by TaylorTRoom on July 28th, 2008 under Football, Recruiting

I hope this series helped you with the dead season withdrawal pains. I learned a lot in researching it, and wanted to finish it with some conclusions drawn from the case studies.1. There are very, very few coaches who can overcome significant talent deficits with superior scheming. I can think of none who have done so for extended periods of time. If a coach does develop a superior way to line up his players, he will be mimicked within a season or two.  His assistants will be hired away. All experienced head coaches know that superior talent is the best edge to have.

2. The cheating programs are usually trying to overcome some inherent recruiting disadvantage. Not all scholarships have equal value. They know that without extra inducements, they cannot recruit evenly with schools that have better locations, more prestige, or a better history.  The promised payments are a way to make their scholarship offer equal in worth to that of their rivals.

Understandably, no school’s supporters want to admit that their scholarships are not as valued as others. That’s why they typically justify cheating by claiming that their rivals are cheating, too.

3. Cheating works. It really, really works. Paying recruits and players leads to better players, which leads to more wins. There are several examples of average coaches achieving phenomenal results when the talent on their team is illegally spiked upwards. There are no examples of egregious cheaters being conference bottom-dwellers.

 

Cheating Works! 

It is economically effective, too. In the ’80s, the going rate for bought recruits was about $300 per month. That means that a team could get about 15 top players for the price of an assistant coach’s salary.  There are reports of superstar recruits getting six figures, but these are rare players.

4. For the NCAA to penalize a cheater, two things are required- a violation, and somebody to turn them in. There are ways to accomplish the former while not risking the latter- stay out of recruits’ bidding wars, only recruit in territory you have established as “yours”, and don’t antagonize any player you have paid, even if he isn’t panning out on the field.

5. The best protection for a clean program is to be in a conference that has mostly clean programs. The NCAA will not protect your recruiting from dirty rivals in any significant way. Ironically, the best protection for a dirty program is to be in a conference that has a lot of dirty programs- you’re less likely to be reported.

6. The two most effective curbs on cheating have been the Death Penalty, and the regulation of booster involvement. The Death penalty was key to getting the most powerful alums to support the universities’ administrations, rather than the football coaches. The alums realized that unrestrained coaches could do far more damage to the program than simply inept coaches. Limiting booster involvement was crucial because the hyper-competitive boosters were behind most of the worst violations.

7. The NCAA represents about 120 D-1A schools. In the past 50 years, the NCAA has instituted rule changes that have made it extremely difficult for 75% of its member institutions to compete nationally. In 1950, there was a laissez faire market for talent, and the single platoon rules in football meant that a school rally only needed 15 really good players to compete nationally. Now, the market for talent is heavily regulated, and two platoon rules means that a team needs 25 – 30 really good players to be competitive nationally. This situation is probably not what the NCAA intended, but it is what it has created.

Well, that’s all I have. I hope you enjoyed reading this as much as I enjoyed compiling. Thanks for all of the comments and kind (and even unkind) words.

Article Tags:

More from this Barker


Share This

  • StumbleUpon

9 Responses

  1. Beergut said:

    July 28th, 2008 at 9:13 pm

    “1. There are very, very few coaches who can overcome significant talent deficits with superior scheming. I can think of none who have done so for extended periods of time.”

    Rich Rodriguez and West Virginia would disagree with you. Yes, they eventually began to get better talent, but the state of West Virginia doesn’t produce much talent, and they used innovative offensive and defensive schemes to make themselves competitive.

    I think if you look at numbers of players drafted, you will see that he did it without an extreme number of incredibly talented players.

    I would say RichRod was successful for an extended period of time.

    Even though many have copied what he does, no one runs their offense better than West Virginia, which shows you the advantage of having the inventor on your staff.

    “That’s why they typically justify cheating by claiming that their rivals are cheating, too.”

    Well, if the rival in question gets busted by the NCAA, the claim that the rival is doing it, too, is accurate.

    I think some schools that think they have all the inherent advantages and therefore, a more ‘valuable’ scholarship, are too quick to dismiss the success of others by claiming “they cheated”. Alabama and Auburn are a perfect example.

    “There are no examples of egregious cheaters being conference bottom-dwellers.”

    Baylor’s football program under Chuck Reedy/Kevin Steele would disagree with this statement.

  2. flamingmonkeyass said:

    July 28th, 2008 at 10:59 pm

    I would argue that RichRod didn’t really find elite success until he had Pat White and Steve Slaton in his backfield. And as far as his defensive innovation, well frankly that’s just false. West Virginia’s defense under Rodriguez was on more than one occassion their kink in their armor.

    Also I’d be more inclined to believe that “other” programs’ (by which I assume you mean a&m and ou) success was not a result of cheating when accussed by “some schools” (by which I assume you mean UT) if the NCAA did not repeatedly find major violations upon investigation. In that case I don’t think it would be so much “dismissing their success” as it would be “telling it like it is.”

  3. Stuck in MN said:

    July 29th, 2008 at 5:33 am

    Did Baylor cheat under Ready and Steele? I know they cheated like crazy when Teaff was there (i.e. back when they were good) but I had not heard about it more recently. If they were buying players they did a very poor job.

    If you can honestly look at the frequency and severity of the respective violations at Texas and A&M and come to the conclusion that they were both doing the same thing, then I just don’t know what to tell you. All I know is that for a fan base whose mantra is they do not lie, cheat or steal or tolerate those that do, aggy still holds up Jackie as an icon.

    TaylorT- outstanding job. I really enjoyed this.

  4. Beergut said:

    July 29th, 2008 at 6:13 am

    One of the reasons Reedy was fired was b/c he was using booster slush money to buy recruits who then wouldn’t qualify to get into school, so the boosters were not seeing a return on their investment.

    flamingmonkeyass and Stuck in MN,

    texas was busted by the NCAA for major violations twice in the 1980s. A&M and Oklahoma were also busted for cheating in the 1980s. I don’t see how you can claim the only reason those programs succeeded was that they were cheating, when texas was cheating, too.

  5. Beergut said:

    July 29th, 2008 at 6:22 am

    “And as far as his defensive innovation, well frankly that’s just false. West Virginia’s defense under Rodriguez was on more than one occassion their kink (sic) in their armor”

    First of all, I’m talking about making them competitive with inferior talent, not elite. Their 33 Stack scheme has allowed them to be more than competitive.

    Second issue: Elite is a matter of interpretation. I’d say their defense dominating OU in the Fiesta Bowl is pretty damn elite.

  6. Stuck in MN said:

    July 29th, 2008 at 8:50 am

    Once again, go read part 8 of the series and compare and contrast with latter sections of part 9 dealing with aggy. Also read the actual NCAA summaries. Do you see a difference?

    I am not claiming Texas did not cheat in the early to mid 80’s, I am claiming that the severity and frequency of such cheating pales in comparison to aggy under sherrill during that time and well into the late 80’s.

  7. Black Scholes said:

    July 29th, 2008 at 4:39 pm

    Waste of time. You will never get an aggy to admit the difference. Thankfully I no longer care about their sad rationalizations.

  8. R. Cobb said:

    August 17th, 2008 at 6:14 pm

    Two points:

    First, those pointing the finger at Baylor are breaking TaylorTRoom’s cardinal rule: Don’t accuse people of cheating unless you can prove it.

    I also have a question, for Taylor in particular, but also for anyone else who wants to chime in: You mention that you will not accuse people of cheating unless they were caught by the NCAA, but is it fair to assume that there might be more going on than is actually caught and punished? For example, is it safe to assume that more players were involved in OU’s Big Red auto sales scandal than actually received punishment?

  9. TaylorTRoom said:

    August 17th, 2008 at 6:25 pm

    Well, that’s just my rule. I think you need consistent standards when making comparisons. Of course, I diverged when I was posting on the George Smith/TAMU deal. There was no NCAA violation finalized, but there was plenty of reporting.

Leave a Reply

Follow Us

Related Articles

Hot Forum Topics

Activity

  • Scipio Tex commented on the blog post Place Your Bets, Gentlemens   30 minutes ago

    explain…

  • Scipio Tex commented on the blog post Now THAT’S Taking One For The Team   46 minutes ago

    He played for New Mexico State.

    We recruited him briefly, along with Louisville, Pitt and a host of others. Everyone ran when they realized he was a lunatic.

  • Scipio Tex commented on the blog post Now THAT’S Taking One For The Team   46 minutes ago

    He played for New Mexico State.

  • Jorgrama commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   48 minutes ago

    Had some harsh words about Barnes in that podcast, that’s for sure. . . .

  • dick commented on the blog post Now THAT’S Taking One For The Team   51 minutes ago

    Didn’t we think we target him at one point?

    He’s a good player, imagine UNM with him on their #3 seed roster.

  • dick wrote a new blog post: FLV March Madness First Round Bets   53 minutes ago

    Here we are, my favorite weekend of the year.  I’ve taken sick days on the first two days of the tourney every year except my first and this year is no different (i’m feverish, which is true).  My one goal for the gambling season (August thru first weekend of April) is to have enough money to bet on every

  • Scipio Tex commented on the blog post Now THAT’S Taking One For The Team   1 hour, 23 minutes ago

    Pope was a real head case recruit, if I recall correctly.

    Shot four times in high school too.

    Transferred to the Hall from New Mexico St after all of the Big Schools gave him the cold shoulder for his recruiting antics.

  • Scipio Tex wrote a new blog post: Place Your Bets, Gentlemens   1 hour, 30 minutes ago

    First, if you’re not reading Fading Las Vegas or March to March, you’re missing out on the best college basketball prognostication available in the free market. The vast bulk of Kevin Berger’s basketball writing is going to be found there, so click accordingly.

    The key delineation to make is that Fading Las Vegas

  • admin commented on the blog post Final Four Prediction   2 hours, 22 minutes ago

    Baylor scares me. They have no idea what the bright lights feel like.

    Huggins also has a horrible history with high seeds from his days at Cincy.

    Bingo.

    Bingo.

    Yet Gary Williams has a ring. Maybe this is Huggy’s year and maybe Scott Drew can get laid in a morgue. Love to see what Huggy could have

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • admin commented on the blog post Final Four Prediction   2 hours, 22 minutes ago

    Baylor scares me. They have no idea what the bright lights feel like.

    Huggins also has a horrible history with high seeds from his days at Cincy.

    Bingo.

    Bingo.

    Yet Gary Williams has a ring. Maybe this is Huggy’s year and maybe Scott Drew can get laid in a morgue.

    I have these guys in my bracket. DEEP.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • dick commented on the blog post Early NCAA Tournament Bets   2 hours, 33 minutes ago

    Travis,

    63-58 on KenPom for 121. That’s still a really low scoring game

  • Scipio Tex commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   3 hours, 13 minutes ago

    Thanks, dick. Interesting perspective.

  • dick commented on the blog post The Definitive Bracket: 63 Guaranteed Winners!   3 hours, 36 minutes ago

    KB,

    You are going to be too smart for your own good. A common fault amongst Bracket makers. There’s a reason why the 55 year old admins win 80% of these things every year.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • dick commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   3 hours, 40 minutes ago

    “which impresses me since I know he didn’t hear the podcast.”

    You shouldn’t be, after reading both guys over the past year, KB knows more about basketball and gambling than Millman does and it’s not even close.

    A little warning about Chad Millman. I was pretty excited when I heard that ESPN hired a

  • Luke wrote a new blog post: Some perspective for a generation of Wildcats   3 hours, 41 minutes ago

    Kansas State is beginning the NCAA tournament as a #2 seed with legitimate final four hopes (just ask the president) in less than 24 hours.

    I’m going to need a moment to admire that sentence…….

    OK, I’m good.

    As the anticipation has built over the last few days, I’m sure I’m not the only one who has taken

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • whiskey wrote a new blog post: Chalk Talk: The ND 3-4 Transition Part I- Expectations   4 hours, 6 minutes ago

    Welcome to the first of what I hope will be many installments of “Chalk Talk” with LB Coach. I am excited to introduce LB Coach as a new contributor to One Foot Down. LB Coach has a significant amount of experience playing football at Notre Dame and on the professional level. He also has a

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • dick commented on the blog post Early NCAA Tournament Bets   4 hours, 22 minutes ago

    I’ll post all of my first day games tonight.

  • srr50 wrote a new blog post: Now THAT’S Taking One For The Team   6 hours, 42 minutes ago

    Aggie Corp with “Squeeze Army?”

    POSERS

    Texas Tech forward Darko Cohadarevic doesn’t just talk the talk — he walks the walk.

    Tuesday night Tech faced Seton Hall in a first round NIT contest. With the game tied at 10, Seton Hall forward Herb Pope delivered two below-the-belt blows to Cohadarevic.

    After Pope was ejected, Tech went on

  • Kevin Berger commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   8 hours, 25 minutes ago

    Louisville has a great chance if Jerry Smith is healthy.

  • Kevin Berger commented on the blog post Final Four Prediction   8 hours, 27 minutes ago

    Good team that took number 1 seeded Louisville to the wire in last year’s tournament. Start 3 seniors and two juniors, very athletic. Solid pass first point guard. Their leading scorer was player of the year in the conference.

    Good club that plays multiple defenses.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • ghostofagroundgame commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   8 hours, 52 minutes ago

    I just took Baylor going to the Elite 8. It’s a crazy mixed up world we live in.

    Is it just me, or does it pain anyone else to not be able to determine who is going to beat Duke early? It’s bound to happen, but who will it be?

  • Art Vandelay commented on the blog post Final Four Prediction   8 hours, 54 minutes ago

    By “we” I meant the Horns. Kevin, why should I take Siena over A&M?

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • Kevin Berger commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   9 hours, 8 minutes ago

    colorado ag, Utah State is as athletic as Nebraska. You’ll be fine as long as they don’t go 16 for 31 from three.

    Siena, on the other hand, is going to beat you like you stole something. Maybe not, but the Saints should win.

  • Kevin Berger commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   9 hours, 12 minutes ago

    Great article Scipio. Also, thanks for the dime.

    Looking at the Tournament futures market, Vegas is telling us what they think about Onuaku’s health. The Orangemen have the easiest region and road to the fianl four, yet they’re +700 to win it all, while UK and Kansas, teams with much tougher roads, are +250

  • Art Vandelay commented on the blog post Final Four Prediction   9 hours, 17 minutes ago

    My brackets are pretty much locked down except the South. Can’t get myself to take Baylor, and Duke doesn’t feel right. Nobody seems to be high on Nova. It’s all about the Big East and Big 12 this year.

    It’s a crying shame we suck so bad. We are in a good

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });

  • James commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   9 hours, 27 minutes ago

    Scip, like a peaceful Indian in the 1800’s, I never trust a Mormon that can shoot. Utah State has me worried.

    If we escape the first weekend, things get very interesting with a potential Sweet 16 match-up with Duke. Ugly up the game and guard like hell on the perimeter in front of a

  • Scipio Tex commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   9 hours, 57 minutes ago

    CJD -

    Possibly. However, I’m telling you – the beauty of these intergame lines is that when you see that all-too-familiar big early game lead that you know will evaporate down the stretch as soon as the team starts regressing to their 3 point shooting mean, there’s some money to be made.

  • Scipio Tex commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   9 hours, 59 minutes ago

    uthookem-

    I’d say you have your priorities straight.

    colorado -

    Anytime. How far do you think the Aggies go? A lot of people think Utah State is the most dangerous pure shooting team in the tournament.

  • uthookem commented on the blog post Bracket Breakdown & Gambling Tips   10 hours, 10 minutes ago

    Last year in Vegas, Friday morning, stumble to the line at 8:30 to make my bets, put $20 on a four-team parlay on the four 9:00 am games, nailed it! Three of the four games’ spread was determined in the final 0:30. Walked away with $220.

    Yeah, so what if that is the only

  • James commented on the blog post Sending Aggies to the NFL   10 hours, 11 minutes ago

    Jordan, all just wild, premature conjecture. I’d hedge that only a third of that 2013 list ever makes an NFL roster. It is picking which third that is the tough part.

    SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: ””, url: ”” });